Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

You Can and You Should

How Judges Can Apply the Hague Abduction Convention to Protect Victims of Domestic Violence

Bibliographic Data

ID21640163
AuthorsMerle Weiner, Merle H Weiner (0000-0002-0145-4720, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume28
Issue1
Publication date2021-12-20
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueUCLA Women s Law Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1068-9893 • E-ISSN: 1943-1708
PublisherCalifornia Digital Library (CDL) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5070/l328155744
OpenAlexW4200294423
LanguageEN
Citations received1

This Article is written for trial judges who adjudicate cases pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (Hague Convention), although appellate judges, lawyers, and scholars may also find it of interest. Trial judges are my target audience because they are the best defense against the potential injustice that the Hague Convention creates for domestic violence victims who flee transnationally with their children for safety, then face their batterers’ petitions for the children’s return.While the Hague Convention permits the trial judge to refuse to return a child when the taking parent is a domestic violence victim,and while more people than ever before recognize the appropriateness of nonreturn in this context, the law limits the nonreturn option. In fact, many judges complain that the law is too confining; they lament having to return the child but feel as though the law gives them no choice. Legislators have refused to make the judges’ job any easier. While judges now have helpful authority in some appellatedecisions and the Hague Conference on Private International Law’s new Guide to Good Practice on Article 13(b), these sources are uneven and still insufficient. In light of this reality, this Article aims to provide trial judges, as well as their law clerks, the tools and encouragement to promote justice and safety in these cases, evenwhen the legal doctrine may be problematic.Alleviating judicial discomfort is not my sole purpose, however. Judge Alex Kozinski once wrote, “A troubled [judicial] conscience is certainly not pleasant, but the real-life, brutal consequences of an unjust judicial decision are suffered by others.” My chief objective is to change outcomes for domestic violence victims and their children who might otherwise lose

Adjudication · Appeal · Conscience · Convention · Economic Justice · Political science · Trial court · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · History · International Human Rights and Reproductive Law · Law · Legal Studies and Reforms

  • The Best Interests of the State

    Open Access•Yijia Liu•Social & Legal Studies•2025

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae