Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Increasing transparency of computer-aided detection impairs decision-making in visual search

Bibliographic Data

ID21640268
AuthorsMelina A Kunar (University of Warwick, corresponding author), Giovanni Montana (0000-0003-3942-3900, University of Warwick), Derrick G Watson (University of Warwick)
Year2025
Volume32
Issue2
Pages951-960
Publication date2025-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3758/s13423-024-02601-5
PMID39448515
OpenAlexW4403729036
LanguageEN
References cited37

Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to changes in healthcare. Government and regulatory bodies have advocated the need for transparency in AI systems with recommendations to provide users with more details about AI accuracy and how AI systems work. However, increased transparency could lead to negative outcomes if humans become overreliant on the technology. This study investigated how changes in AI transparency affected human decision-making in a medical-screening visual search task. Transparency was manipulated by either giving or withholding knowledge about the accuracy of an ‘AI system’. We tested performance in seven simulated lab mammography tasks, in which observers searched for a cancer which could be correctly or incorrectly flagged by computer-aided detection (CAD) ‘AI prompts’. Across tasks, the CAD systems varied in accuracy. In the ‘transparent’ condition, participants were told the accuracy of the CAD system, in the ‘not transparent’ condition, they were not. The results showed that increasing CAD transparency impaired task performance, producing an increase in false alarms, decreased sensitivity, an increase in recall rate, and a decrease in positive predictive value. Along with increasing investment in AI, this research shows that it is important to investigate how transparency of AI systems affect human decision-making. Increased transparency may lead to overtrust in AI systems, which can impact clinical outcomes

CAD · Cognitive psychology · Computer security · Engineering drawing · Machine learning · Recall · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Communication · Computer Science · Engineering · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI · Psychology · Radiology practices and education · Artificial Intelligence

  • Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I

    Open Access•Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Marijke Marsman et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2018

  • International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening

    Open Access•Scott Mayer McKinney, Marcin Sieniek et al.•Nature•2020

  • What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors

    Open Access•Andrew F Jarosz, Jennifer Wiley•The Journal of Problem Solving•2014

  • To Trust or to Think

    Open Access•Zana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya et al.•Proceedings of the ACM on…•2021

  • Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II

    Open Access•Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Jonathon Love et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2018

  • PsychoPy2

    Open Access•Jonathan Peirce, Jonathan W Peirce et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2019

  • Towards Transparency by Design for Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Heike Felzmann, Eduard Fosch‐villaronga et al.•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

  • Before and beyond trust

    Open Access•Charalampia Kerasidou, Angeliki Kerasidou et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

  • Detection theory analysis of group data

    Neil A Macmillan, Howard L Kaplan•Psychological Bulletin•1985

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae