Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Canonical and retinal size in visual working memory

Bibliographic Data

ID21640309
AuthorsWilliam L Gronewald (University of Minnesota, corresponding author), Vanessa G Lee (0000-0003-1992-3385, University of Minnesota), Roger W Remington (University of Minnesota)
Year2026
Volume33
Issue5
Publication date2026-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3758/s13423-026-02913-8
PMID42014599
OpenAlexW7155077236
LanguageEN
References cited22

Visual working memory (VWM) is key to many daily tasks, such as remembering visual information about traffic when crossing a busy street. Despite extensive research, the extent to which VWM abstracts out sensory properties not relevant to identification, such as object size, remains unclear. In three experiments, we examined how object size affects VWM, with size defined in two ways: retinal size, referring to the image’s size on the screen (small or large photos), and canonical size, referring to the typical size of objects in the real world, from big (e.g., a tower) to small (e.g., an egg). Experiments 1 and 2 tested memory for real-world objects, classified into four types based on their photo size and canonical size. VWM was better for large rather than small photos—a retinal-size effect—and for canonically small than big objects—a canonical-size effect. These effects were stronger when participants remembered a mix of different-sized objects than when all objects in a display were of the same size. Experiment 3 tested memory for colored squares that were either big or small on the screen. Size had no effect when displays consisted of colored squares of the same size, but big squares were remembered better when mixed with small squares. These results suggest that seemingly irrelevant sensory properties affect VWM, favoring objects that stimulate more neurons. The effect is stronger when size conditions are mixed, indicating that retinally larger objects are better attended

Colored · Display size · Sensory system · Visual perception · Working memory · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction · Tactile and Sensory Interactions

  • Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details

    Open Access•Timothy F Brady, Talia Konkle et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2008

  • Why visual attention and awareness are different

    Open Access•Victor A F Lamme•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2003

  • Visual working memory capacity

    Open Access•Steven J Luck, Edward K Vogel•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2013

  • The intrinsic memorability of face photographs.

    Wilma A Bainbridge, Phillip Isola et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2013

  • The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions

    Open Access•Steven J Luck, Edward K Vogel•Nature•1997

  • G*Power 3

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae