Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Will I speak louder if I see you struggling to understand? Speech modifications in response to non-verbal visual cues of listening effort

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21640935
AutoresElena Gessa (0000-0002-0623-9130, Lyon 1 Université, autor de correspondencia), Chiara Valzolgher (0000-0002-1354-3288, University of Trento), Elena Giovanelli (0000-0001-7753-632X, University of Trento), Tommaso Rosi (0000-0002-7381-6241, University of Trento), Clément Désoche (0000-0003-0932-6747, Lyon 1 Université), Alessandro Farnè (0000-0001-5769-3491, Lyon 1 Université), Francesco Pavani (0000-0003-0426-5578, University of Trento)
Año2026
Volumen33
Número5
Fecha de publicación2026-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPsychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3758/s13423-026-02942-3
PMID42298253
OpenAlexW7164809911
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas55

During face-to-face interactions, overt non-verbal cues from conversational partners can reflect the quality of the conversation. Here, we investigated the impact of specific visual non-verbal cues (i.e., facial expressions of confusion, approaching movements towards the speaker), on the speakers’ acoustic–phonetic adaptations typically employed to enhance clarity (i.e., speech rate, voice intensity, and pitch). Participants read sentences to a listener seated in a separate room and visible through a head-mounted display. Crucially, no auditory feedback was provided. Unknown to participants, the listener was a confederate whose behavior was pre-recorded in silence using a 360° video camera. The confederate simulated three different levels of listening effort: easy, medium, and hard. After each trial, participants rated the estimated listening effort and comprehension of the confederate, as well as their own speaking effort. In Experiment 1 ( N = 22), participants were told their voice was transmitted with varying background noise levels, providing a rationale for potential listener difficulties. In Experiment 2 ( N = 12), no mention of background noise was made, to further isolate the effects of visual cues. In both experiments, participants adjusted their speech to the seen listener’s behavior. Experiment 1 showed adaptations across all measured parameters, and significant modulations persisted for most parameters in Experiment 2. These adaptations were already present in the earliest phase of exposure to the visual effort cues and remained stable across the mini-block, suggesting a rapid and highly sensitive monitoring mechanism. These findings indicate that visible non-verbal cues of listening effort can elicit acoustic–phonetic adaptations, even in the absence of acoustic feedback or explicit communicative signals, highlighting their role in regulating communication and maintaining speech clarity

Active listening · CLARITY · Comprehension · Cue-dependent forgetting · Listening comprehension · Sensory cue · Silence · Multisensory perception and integration · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Phonetics and Phonology Research

  • Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices

    Ingo R Titze•The Journal of the Acoustical…•1989

  • Dialog as interpersonal synergy

    Riccardo Fusaroli, Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi et al.•New Ideas in Psychology•2014

  • Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication

    Open Access•Judith Holler, C Levinson et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2019

  • Language as a multimodal phenomenon

    Open Access•Gabriella Vigliocco, Pamela Perni et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2014

  • Controlling the False Discovery Rate

    Open Access•Yoav Benjamini, Yosef Hochberg•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•1995

  • The Development of Fluency in Advanced Learners of French

    Richard Towell, Roger Hawkins et al.•Applied Linguistics•1996

  • Foreigner Talk, Baby Talk, Native Talk

    Barbara F Freed•International Journal of the…•1981

  • The current status of the motherese hypothesis

    Open Access•Lila R Gleitman, Elissa L Newport et al.•Journal of Child Language•1984

  • Mothers' Speech to Hearing‐Impaired Infants and Children With Cochlear Implants

    Open Access•Tonya R Bergeson, Rachel J Miller et al.•Infancy•2006

  • How Children and Adults Produce and Perceive Uncertainty in Audiovisual Speech

    Open Access•Emiel Krahmer, Marc Swerts•Language and Speech•2005

  • Auditory feedback on the regulation of vocal intensity of preschool children

    Gerald M Siegel, Herbert L Pick et al.•Developmental Psychology•1976

  • Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness

    Arthur Aron, Elaine N Aron et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1992

  • The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors

    Nancy Eisenberg, Paul Miller et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1987

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae