Examining the impact of attentional focus and partner gaze on interpersonal coordination
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21640939 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Margaret Catherine Macpherson (0000-0003-3434-9334, The University of Western Australia, corresponding author), A J Brown (0000-0003-2588-3826, The University of Western Australia), Lynden K Miles (0000-0002-4164-3470, The University of Western Australia) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 2201-2210 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3758/s13423-025-02695-5 |
| PMID | 40268832 |
| OpenAlex | W4409722225 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 49 |
As a foundation of social interaction, interpersonal coordination is boosted in prosocial contexts but undermined by negative situations. Exactly how social factors shape coordination is, however, unknown. Previous literature demonstrates that for coordination to emerge people must attend to their interaction partners. This evidence, however, draws from sterile laboratory studies employing heavy-handed manipulations of little interpersonal relevance. By contrast, in more naturalistic contexts subtle differences in how people attend to themselves and others (e.g., a lingering glance vs. a suspicious side glance) can profoundly change the course of interaction. Understanding how social factors shape interpersonal coordination therefore requires consideration of aspects of attentional behaviour that better characterise everyday interaction. To this end, the current research employed virtual reality (VR) to explore how two core features of social attention, focus (self vs. other) and partner gaze (direct vs. averted), influence the spontaneous coordination of arm and head movements. The results indicated that: (i) coordination was enhanced in the other (cf. self) focus condition; and (ii) coordination was diminished in the averted (cf. direct) gaze condition. These findings provide novel evidence to indicate that the emergence of interpersonal coordination varies as a function of the everyday attentional behaviours that punctuate naturalistic social exchange. Of broad theoretical note, here we demonstrate that the among the factors constraining interpersonal coordination, the distribution of attention between self and other plays a meaningful role
Cognitive psychology · Gaze · Interpersonal communication · Interpersonal relationship · Prosocial behavior · Social relation · Action Observation and Synchronization · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology
Exploratory data analysis
Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments
Rocking together
Chapter 6 Ostracism
Emmeans
A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements
Social Phobia
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
Sensorimotor synchronization
Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention
G*Power 3
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
LmerTest Package
Evaluating the Dynamics of Unintended Interpersonal Coordination
Too late to coordinate
Evaluating the interplay between subclinical levels of mental health symptoms and coordination dynamics
Synchrony and mental health
Who syncs? Social motives and interpersonal coordination
To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony's effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect
The restless mind
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |