Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Examining the impact of attentional focus and partner gaze on interpersonal coordination

Bibliographic Data

ID21640939
AuthorsMargaret Catherine Macpherson (0000-0003-3434-9334, The University of Western Australia, corresponding author), A J Brown (0000-0003-2588-3826, The University of Western Australia), Lynden K Miles (0000-0002-4164-3470, The University of Western Australia)
Year2025
Volume32
Issue5
Pages2201-2210
Publication date2025-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3758/s13423-025-02695-5
PMID40268832
OpenAlexW4409722225
LanguageEN
References cited49

As a foundation of social interaction, interpersonal coordination is boosted in prosocial contexts but undermined by negative situations. Exactly how social factors shape coordination is, however, unknown. Previous literature demonstrates that for coordination to emerge people must attend to their interaction partners. This evidence, however, draws from sterile laboratory studies employing heavy-handed manipulations of little interpersonal relevance. By contrast, in more naturalistic contexts subtle differences in how people attend to themselves and others (e.g., a lingering glance vs. a suspicious side glance) can profoundly change the course of interaction. Understanding how social factors shape interpersonal coordination therefore requires consideration of aspects of attentional behaviour that better characterise everyday interaction. To this end, the current research employed virtual reality (VR) to explore how two core features of social attention, focus (self vs. other) and partner gaze (direct vs. averted), influence the spontaneous coordination of arm and head movements. The results indicated that: (i) coordination was enhanced in the other (cf. self) focus condition; and (ii) coordination was diminished in the averted (cf. direct) gaze condition. These findings provide novel evidence to indicate that the emergence of interpersonal coordination varies as a function of the everyday attentional behaviours that punctuate naturalistic social exchange. Of broad theoretical note, here we demonstrate that the among the factors constraining interpersonal coordination, the distribution of attention between self and other plays a meaningful role

Cognitive psychology · Gaze · Interpersonal communication · Interpersonal relationship · Prosocial behavior · Social relation · Action Observation and Synchronization · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Exploratory data analysis

    John Wilder Tukey•Exploratory data analysis•1977

  • Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments

    Egon Brunswik•Perception and the Representative…•1956

  • Rocking together

    Open Access•Michael J Richardson, Kerry L Marsh et al.•Human Movement Science•2007

  • Chapter 6 Ostracism

    Kimberly D Williams, Kipling D Williams•Advances in Experimental Social…•2009

  • Emmeans

    Russell V Lenth, Julia Piaskowski•CRAN: Contributed Packages•2017

  • A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements

    Open Access•Hermann Haken, J A Scott Kelso et al.•Biological Cybernetics•1985

  • Social Phobia

    Open Access•Michael R Liebowitz•Anxiety•2015

  • An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research

    Open Access•Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Ruud Wetzels et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2012

  • Sensorimotor synchronization

    Open Access•Bruno H Repp, Yi-Huang Su•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2013

  • Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention

    Open Access•Stephen R H Langton, Vicki Bruce et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2000

  • G*Power 3

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • LmerTest Package

    Open Access•Alexandra Kuznetsova, Per B Brockhoff et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • Evaluating the Dynamics of Unintended Interpersonal Coordination

    R C Schmidt, Beth A O’Brien et al.•Ecological Psychology•1997

  • Too late to coordinate

    Open Access•Lynden K Miles, Jordan L Griffiths et al.•European Journal of Social…•2010

  • Evaluating the interplay between subclinical levels of mental health symptoms and coordination dynamics

    Open Access•Margaret Catherine Macpherson, Dannette Marie et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2020

  • Synchrony and mental health

    Open Access•Margaret Catherine Macpherson, Lynden K Miles•Journal of Experimental Social…•2022

  • Who syncs? Social motives and interpersonal coordination

    Open Access•Joanne Lumsden, Lynden K Miles et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2011

  • To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony's effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect

    Open Access•Reneeta Mogan, Ronald Fischer et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2017

  • The restless mind

    Jonathan Smallwood, Jonathan W Schooler•Psychological Bulletin•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae