Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is transcranial alternating current stimulation effective for improving working memory? A three-level meta-analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID21641299
AuthorsSiyuan Zhang (0000-0001-6354-9736, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Xiaobing Cui (0000-0003-0262-1794), Xiao‐Bing Cui (0000-0002-5254-7935, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Shuting Yu (0009-0000-8647-4108, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Xuebing Li (0000-0002-4713-9208, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume32
Issue2
Pages636-651
Publication date2025-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3758/s13423-024-02595-0
PMID39438426
OpenAlexW4403634773
LanguageEN
References cited123

Alternating current · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Meta-analysis · Stimulation · Transcranial alternating current stimulation · Transcranial magnetic stimulation · Working memory · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neuroscience · Psychology · Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

  • Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information

    Open Access•Wolfgang Klimesch•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2012

  • Estimating Effect Sizes From Pretest-Posttest-Control Group Designs

    Open Access•Scott B Morris•Organizational Research Methods•2008

  • EEG alpha oscillations

    Open Access•Wolfgang Klimesch, Paul Sauseng et al.•Brain Research Reviews•2007

  • RoB 2

    Open Access•Jonathan Sterne, Jelena Savović et al.•BMJ•2019

  • The concurrent validity of the N -back task as a working memory measure

    Susanne M Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl et al.•Memory•2010

  • A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis

    Open Access•Michael Borenstein, Larry V Hedges et al.•Research Synthesis Methods•2010

  • N‐back working memory paradigm

    Open Access•Adrian M Owen, Kathryn M McMillan et al.•Human Brain Mapping•2005

  • A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis

    Sue Duval, Richard Tweedie et al.•Journal of the American…•2000

  • Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    Open Access•Matthias Egger, Gregory D Smith et al.•BMJ•1997

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science

    Open Access•Daniël Lakens•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Anxiety and working memory capacity

    Tim P Moran•Psychological Bulletin•2016

  • Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review

    Monica Melby-Lervåg, Charles Hulme et al.•Developmental Psychology•2013

  • What limits working memory capacity

    Klaus Oberauer, Farrell et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2016

  • Working Memory and Intelligence

    Phillip L Ackerman, Margaret E Beier et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2005

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae