The role of action inhibition for behavioral control in joint action
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21641335 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martin E Maier (0000-0002-3570-4943, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, corresponding author), Roman Liepelt (0000-0002-4656-6267, FernUniversität in Hagen), Marco Steinhauser (0000-0001-6800-6036, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 200-211 |
| Publication date | 2023-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3758/s13423-022-02162-5 |
| PMID | 35971035 |
| OpenAlex | W4291905264 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 40 |
When two individuals share a task with a common goal, coordinating one’s own and the other’s actions is pivotal. Inhibition of one’s own actions when it is the other’s turn to act is assumed to play a crucial role in this process. For instance, in the joint Simon task, two individuals share a two-choice task such that one of them responds to one stimulus type and ignores the stimulus type to which the other responds. Because stimuli can either appear on one’s own or on the other’s side, stimulus location can conflict with stimulus identity, thus slowing response time. It has previously been shown that such conflict leads to a reduction of the detrimental effects of conflict on immediately upcoming trials both following own responses and even more so following the other’s responses. This amplified trial-to-trial adjustment following the other’s responses has been assumed to reflect the inhibition of own responses on the other’s trials. The present study tested this hypothesis by comparing sequential trial-to-trial adjustments following correct responses and commission errors on which the inhibition of own responses has failed. As expected, adjustments were stronger following the other’s correct responses than following own correct responses. Crucially, such amplification of sequential adjustment was not observed following own commission errors on the other’s trials. This shows that amplification of sequential adjustments following the other’s trials depend on successful inhibition of own responses on these trials and points to a crucial role of response inhibition for behavioral control in joint action
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Simon effect · Action Observation and Synchronization · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neuroscience · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |