Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Repetition costs in sequence chunking

Bibliographic Data

ID21641426
AuthorsR Michael Brown (0000-0002-4851-8429), R R Judkins (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), Iring Koch (0000-0001-9664-8220), P F Tortorelli (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), I G Wright (0000-0002-8123-0902, Oak Ridge National Laboratory)
Year2024
Volume31
Issue2
Pages802-818
Publication date2024-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3758/s13423-023-02338-7
OpenAlexW37726598
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited53

We examined how flexibly we plan sequences of actions when we switch between multiple action sequences. Mastering a sequential skill is assumed to involve integrating successive actions into groups known as chunks that can be efficiently planned and smoothly executed. Chunking is suggested by gains in planning efficiency for long compared to short action sequences following practice and learning associations between actions and perceptual outcomes. Less is understood about how efficiently we plan sequential chunks when we switch between multiple action sequences. Do we plan learned chunks less efficiently when we switch to a different action sequence? We examined this question by comparing the initiation and execution latencies of long versus short action sequences, performed from memory, when sequences switched or repeated across trials. Additionally, each action within the sequences generated predictable perceptual outcomes that were either spatially compatible or spatially incompatible with the action sequences. Results suggested repetition costs (instead of benefits) when performing long sequences. Repetition, as opposed to switching, prolonged initiation and increased the error rate of long compared to short sequences. We attribute these results to the flexible coordination of chunk planning and execution. Repetition may prolong advanced planning of long sequences in order to resolve conflict between multiple chunks, and switching may allow the planning of later chunks to be postponed until execution. We propose that the chunking of action sequences can both facilitate and interfere with action-switching performance

Combustion · Combustor · Electrical engineering · Integrated gasification combined cycle · Nuclear engineering · Process engineering · Syngas · Waste management · Chemistry · Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics · Engineering · Environmental Science · Materials Science · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

  • Working memory involvement in action planning does not include timing initiation structure

    Open Access•Stuart T Klapp, Dana Maslovat•Psychological Research•2024

  • Task switching

    Open Access•Stephen Monsell•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2003

  • Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control

    Anthony G Greenwald•Psychological Review•1970

  • The Theory of Event Coding (TEC)

    Open Access•Bernhard Hommel, Jochen Müsseler et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2001

  • Inhibition of return

    Open Access•Richard M Klein, Raymond M Klein•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2000

  • Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science

    Open Access•Daniël Lakens•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Response-repetition costs reflect changes to the representation of an action

    Open Access•Jonathan Schacherer, Eliot Hazeltine•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2022

  • The role of action effects in motor sequence planning and execution

    Open Access•R Michael Brown, Erik Friedgen et al.•Psychological Research•2022

  • Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research

    Iring Koch, Edita Poljac et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2018

  • A review of contemporary ideomotor theory

    Yun Kyoung Shin, Robert W Proctor et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2010

  • Control and interference in task switching—A review

    A Kiesel, Marco Steinhauser et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2010

  • Dual-task interference in simple tasks

    Harold Pashler•Psychological Bulletin•1994

  • Movement control in skilled motor performance

    Steven W Keele•Psychological Bulletin•1968

  • Task switching

    André Vandierendonck, Baptist Liefooghe et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2010

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae