Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis

More is not Always Better

Bibliographic Data

ID21641791
AuthorsJennifer Koran (0000-0003-2841-4662, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume27
Issue5
Pages765-772
Publication date2020-09-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1070-5511 • E-ISSN: 1532-8007
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10705511.2019.1706527
OpenAlexW2994893945
LanguageEN
Citations received18
References cited22

Although some research in confirmatory factor analysis has suggested that more indicators per factor are generally better, studies have also documented that sample size requirements increase as model size increases. The present study used Monte Carlo simulation to investigate the effect of indicators per factor on sample size requirements. Results demonstrated a nonlinear association between the number of indicators per factor and the minimum required sample size while avoiding six important consequences for the analysis, such as bias in the model chi-square statistic. There is an upper limit for the desirable number of indicators per factor, and this upper limit depends on the number of factors and factor determinacy. The results showed clear patterns for the specific consequences that were most likely with too few or too many indicators per factor and inadequate sample size. Implications for further research are discussed

Confirmatory factor analysis · Determinacy · Econometrics · Factor analysis · Monte Carlo method · Physics · Sample size determination · Statistic · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques · Computer Science · Customer Service Quality and Loyalty · Mathematics · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

  • Evaluating the factor structure of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory

    Open Access•Dustin A Seidler, Dustin Seidler et al.•Journal of Contextual Behavioral…•2020

  • Psychometric properties of the American version of the Chronic Uncertainty scale

    Open Access•Shiwa Ghassabei, Walid A Afifi et al.•BMC Psychology•2024

  • Measurement invariance of core communication constructs across race, nationality, and age

    Open Access•Brian Manata, Andrew C High et al.•Journal of Communication•2025

  • From privacy concerns to customer citizenship behavior

    Open Access•Lifeng Chen, Siti Nor Bayaah Ahmad et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2026

  • Digital corporate social responsibility and customer digital citizenship behavior

    Open Access•Xiangyu Bian, Yitong Chen•Current Psychology•2026

  • The role of social media activism in offline conservation attitudes and behaviors

    Open Access•Yanitza A Cruz Crespo, M Cruz•Computers in Human Behavior•2023

  • Validation of the Good Lives Assessment of Domains in an Adult U.S. Sample

    Open Access•Jeremy Olson, Dennis Giever et al.•International Journal of Offender…•2026

  • A literature review of model fit and model comparisons with confirmatory factor analysis

    Open Access•M C Howard, Melanie Boudreaux et al.•Applied Psychology•2025

  • Evaluating the use of structural equation modeling in online purchase intention research

    Open Access•René Abreu-Ledón, Darkys E Luján-García et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2026

  • Generalized Linear Factor Score Regression

    Open Access•Hildegarde Hawthorne, Gustaf Andersson et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2021

  • On Selecting Indicators for SEM Models

    Keke Lai•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2024

  • The process model of self‐control

    Open Access•Mina Milosevic, Patrick D Converse et al.•Applied Psychology•2024

  • The Sexual Function Evaluation Questionnaire (SFEQ) to Evaluate Effectiveness of Treatment for Sexual Difficulties

    Open Access•Kirstin R Mitchell, Karen Gurney et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2021

  • Attitudes of Health Professionals towards Integrated Health Campuses

    Open Access•Busra Saylan, Songül Çınaroğlu et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2023

  • Adolescent motivations to abstain from sex and alcohol

    Sam A Hardy, Jeffrey L Hurst•Applied Developmental Science•2022

  • When do municipalities smooth access for new social assistance claimants? Local determinants of municipal welfare agency's implementation practices in Belgium

    Open Access•Julie Janssens, Sarah Marchal•Journal of Social Policy•2024

  • On the nature of influence

    Open Access•M Cruz, Brian Manata et al.•Human Communication Research•2025

  • Seeking support via mediated channels

    Open Access•David A Lee, M Cruz et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2024

  • Power of the Likelihood Ratio Test in Covariance Structure Analysis

    Open Access•Albert Satorra, Willem E Saris•Psychometrika•1985

  • Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling

    D A Kenny, D Betsy Mccoach•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2003

  • How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power

    Linda K Muthén, Bengt Muthén et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2002

  • The Persistence of Underpowered Studies in Psychological Research

    Scott E Maxwell•Psychological Methods•2004

  • Nonconvergence, Improper Solutions, and Starting Values in Lisrel Maximum Likelihood Estimation

    Open Access•Anne Boomsma•Psychometrika•1985

  • Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2012

  • Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.

    Robert C Maccallum, Michael W Browne et al.•Psychological Methods•1996

  • Testing Structural Equation Models

    J Scott Long, Kenneth A Bollen•Testing Structural Equation Models•2012

  • Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models

    Open Access•Erika J Wolf, Kelly Harrington et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2013

  • Measurement Model Quality, Sample Size, and Solution Propriety in Confirmatory Factor Models

    Phill Gagné, Gregory R Hancock•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2006

  • Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis

    Herbert W Marsh, Kit‐Tai Hau et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1998

  • Evaluating Small Sample Approaches for Model Test Statistics in Structural Equation Modeling

    Jonathan Nevitt, Gregory R Hancock•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2004

  • Offending estimates in covariance structure analysis

    William R Dillon, Ajith Kumar et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1987

  • Establishing Content-Oriented Evidence for Psychological Assessments

    Glenn W Lambie, Ashley J Blount et al.•Measurement and Evaluation in…•2017

Citations per year3
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae