The strategic use of incivility in contemporary politics. The case of the 2018 Italian general election on Facebook
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21642017 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rossella Rega (0000-0002-1827-7425, University of Siena, corresponding author), Rita Marchetti (0000-0001-5740-1962, University of Perugia) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 107-132 |
| Publication date | 2021-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Communication Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1071-4421 • E-ISSN: 1547-7487 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10714421.2021.1938464 |
| OpenAlex | W3181929808 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 64 |
The study addresses central issues in contemporary politics in response to growing concern about the impoverishment of political discourse that has become increasingly uncivil. In particular it analhyzes citizens’ reactions to leaders’ uncivil posts on Facebook during the 2018 Italian General Election, by adopting a theoretical-operational model based on a dual approach (top down – bottom up) that examines the forms of adverse communication used by politicians online, and the consequences of these forms on users’ discussion (analyzing both ranking behaviors and users’ comments).Political incivility is operationalized as a multidimensional concept and specific types are proposed, starting from violations of norms of politeness (interpersonal-level) and proceeding to violation of public norms of civility (public-level). Results show that leaders’ use of uncivil messages trigger greater online participation, thus increasing the visibility of their posts. However, the emotional excitement elicited by these triggering forms of elite communication encourage antagonistic and rude behaviors among users, leading to an increase in uncivil comments and thus jeopardizing the quality of online discussion. Overall, it emerges that incivility combined with divisive issues can be thought of as a tool of communication used strategically by politicians to mobilize voters and to strengthen their political affiliation
Civility · Elite · Epistemology · Incivility · Interpersonal communication · Operationalization · Politeness · Political communication · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Right-Wing Populism and Political Instrumentalization of Religion
Differential perceptions of and reactions to incivil and intolerant user comments
Drawing digital lines
Online incivility
Contextures of hate
Patterns of Incivility on U.S. Congress Members' Social Media Accounts
Polarizing publics in Twitter through organic targeting tactics of political incivility
Incivility and Intolerance in Covid-19 Discussions on Facebook
Incivility in Online Discussion
Fuming Mad and Jumping with Joy
Did Covid-19 change the political communication of polarizing leaders? The case of Salvini's campaigning before and after the pandemic
Searching for the Dimensions of Today's Political Incivility
A Civil Tongue
Crises and Civility
Affective Publics
Online Incivility and Public Debate
Agenda-Setting
Frenemies
The age of Twitter
Trolling the trolls
Influence of Discussion Incivility on Deliberation
Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression
Perceptions of Uncivil Discourse Online
The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication
An Investigation of Influentials and the Role of Sentiment in Political Communication on Twitter During Election Periods
Civility 2.0
The Internet and Democratic Discourse
Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments
News Values, Cognitive Biases, and Partisan Incivility in Comment Sections
Vox populi. Il voto ad alta voce del 2018
Il vicolo cieco. Le elezioni del 4 marzo 2018
Replying, disliking, flagging
Tracking the viral spread of incivility on social networking sites
A network analysis of political incivility dimensions
Incivility Online
Shifting the blame. Populist politicians’ use of Twitter as a tool of opposition
Controlling the Conversation
The virtual sphere
Twitter versus Facebook
Sticks and stones
Why Are “Others” So Polarized? Perceived Political Polarization and Media Use in 10 Countries
More than Mimicry? The Role of Anger in Uncivil Reactions to Elite Political Incivility
What is political incivility
Uncivil Name‐Calling in the U.S. Presidency, 1933–2018
Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success
Emotional and behavioural responses to everyday incivility
Democracy online
Partisan Provocation
Mass Polarization
Attack Politics in Presidential Nomination Campaigns
Rousing the Partisan Combatant
Inside the Black Box of Negative Campaign Effects
Following the News? Reception of Uncivil Partisan Media and the Use of Incivility in Political Expression
Platforms for Incivility
Beyond Negativity
What Is Civil Engaged Argument and Why Does Aspiring to It Matter
Political Civility
The Negative Consequences of Uncivil Political Discourse
Affect, Not Ideology
Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies
Lying, Liars, and Lies
The New Videomalaise
Effects of "In-Your-Face" Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition
The President Is in
Meaner on Mobile
When, Why, and How Controversy Causes Conversation
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |