Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Critical reflections on user studies’ evaluation methods for group recommender systems

Bibliographic Data

ID21642278
AuthorsFrancesco Barile (0000-0003-4083-8222, Maastricht University, corresponding author), Pierre Hurlin (Maastricht University), Cedric Waterschoot (0000-0003-4903-2604, Maastricht University), Nava Tintarev (0000-0003-1663-1627, Maastricht University)
Year2026
Volume209
Pages103742
Publication date2026-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1071-5819 • E-ISSN: 1095-9300
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103742
OpenAlexW7124470665
LanguageEN
References cited24

Social choice-based aggregation strategies are often used in group recommender systems to aggregate individual preferences or recommendations. However, previous works evaluating group recommenders with user studies found that the diversity of the group members’ preferences impacts the effectiveness of the strategies. In this paper, we highlight and address the methodological limitations of those previous works. Specifically, the methodologies we introduce demonstrate the following three novelties: 1) We evaluated the strategies from the viewpoint of an “internal evaluator”; 2) We introduced a novel methodology for modeling a fictional but realistic group with specific preference profiles for the group members, defining scenarios with concrete users and items, that are still mapped to specific group configurations; 3) We evaluated the understanding of the participants, by measuring how well they can successfully apply the aggregation strategy to a new scenario. To do this we performed a randomized controlled trial (n=444) using a mixed design with two between-subject factors (the used aggregation strategy and the presented explanation type ), and a within-subject factor (the group configuration ). Our results, with friend groups, showed significant differences in the effectiveness of the aggregation strategies depending on the specific group configuration (i.e., depending on the internal diversity of group members’ preferences), with noticeable differences between evaluations of what is good for the group – external evaluation – and what is good for the participant – internal evaluation . We conclude with methodological implications for group recommender systems

Evaluation methods · Information system · Recommender system · Expert finding and Q&A systems · Information Retrieval and Search Behavior · Recommender Systems and Techniques

  • G*Power 3

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae