Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Syringe Service Program Utilization, Barriers, and Preferences for Design in Rural Appalachia

Differences between Men and Women Who Inject Drugs

Bibliographic Data

ID21645226
AuthorsKathryn E Lancaster (0000-0003-2389-6973, The Ohio State University, corresponding author), Heather L Cooper (0000-0002-0521-2438, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA), C R Browning (0000-0001-7807-3849, The Ohio State University), Carlos Malvestutto (0000-0003-3156-2965, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center), Carlos D Malvestutto (Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA), John F P Bridges (0000-0002-3082-5535, The Ohio State University), April M Young (0000-0003-3969-3249, University of Kentucky)
Year2020
Volume55
Issue14
Pages2268-2277
Publication date2020-11-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSubstance Use & Misuse (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1082-6084 • E-ISSN: 1532-2491
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10826084.2020.1800741
PMID32748730
OpenAlexW3046934756
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited49

Background People who inject drugs (PWID) in rural areas of the United States have had limited access to syringe service programs (SSP). Rural SSP have recently surged, but accompanying research is lacking about PWID utilization, barriers, and preferences for SSP design and how those preferences vary by gender. Methods: Interviewer-administered surveys elicited information about utilization, barriers, and preferences for SSP design from 234 PWID recruited using respondent-driven sampling in Appalachian, Kentucky. Gender differences among reported barriers to utilizing SSP and preferences for program design were explored using Mantel-Haenszel chi-square tests. Results: Overall, 49% of PWID had ever utilized an SSP. The most common reasons for not utilizing an SSP were lack of awareness (23%), fear of being seen or disclosing drug use (19%), and lack of need (19%). The most preferred SSP design was located within a health department (74%) and operating during afternoon hours (66%). Men were more likely than women to prefer SSP in health departments (80% vs. 65%, p = 0.01), while more women than men preferred staffing by health department personnel (62% vs. 46%, p = 0.02). Women were less likely to favor evening hours (55% vs. 70%, p = 0.02). Fewer women wanted SSP nurses (78% vs. 90%, p = 0.01), social workers (11% vs. 24%, p = 0.01), or people who use drugs (20% vs 34%, p = 0.02) to staff SSP. Conclusions: Despite recent scale-up, SSP in Appalachia remain under-utilized. PWID were open to a range of options for SSP design and staffing, though there were variations by gender. Implementation research that identifies best strategies for tailored SSP scale-up in rural settings should be considered

Appalachia · Appalachian Region · Business · Environmental health · Geography · Psychiatry · Syringe · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Medicine · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment · Psychology · Gerontology · Marketing

  • Social Determinants of Safety in a Rural Community

    Open Access•Colin Gill, Charlotte Gill•Social Determinants of Safety in…•2026

  • Correlates of Syringe Acquisition at Syringe Services Program and Pharmacies among Persons Who Inject Drugs

    Open Access•Jonathan Feelemyer, Julie Berg et al.•Journal of Urban Health•2026

  • Injection Behaviors and Use of Syringe Service Programs over Time among People Who Inject Drugs in Baltimore, Maryland

    Danielle German, Jennifer L Glick et al.•Substance Use & Misuse•2024

  • Access to HIV, Viral Hepatitis, and Substance Use Disorder Treatment/Overdose Prevention Services

    Neal Carnes, Alice K Asher et al.•Substance Use & Misuse•2021

  • Overdose prevention behaviors among people who inject drugs in rural Appalachia

    Jody Teel, Joie Cantrell et al.•Drugs Education Prevention and…•2025

  • A multi-site intervention using influencers to communicate about syringe service programmes

    Open Access•Erika Bonnevie, Melissa Dunn Silesky et al.•Health Education Journal•2023

  • Willingness to use syringe service programs and safe consumption sites among methadone patients with histories of injection drug use in a small Midwest community

    Emily Pasman, Elizabeth Agius et al.•Addiction Research & Theory•2021

  • An analysis of syringe service programs across the rural‐urban continuum in the United States

    Open Access•Nathan Dockery, Qian Huang et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2025

  • Syringe services programs in the Bluegrass

    Open Access•Cameron Bushling, Matthew T Walton et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2022

  • Factors associated with perceived ease of access to syringes in Appalachian North Carolina

    Open Access•Delesha M Carpenter, William A Zule et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2023

  • A qualitative analysis of rural syringe service program fidelity in Appalachian Kentucky

    Open Access•Evan J Batty, Umed Ibragimov et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2023

  • Implementation and evaluation of a syringe vending machine trial in Tbilisi, Georgia

    Open Access•David Otiashvili, Irma Kirtadze et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2022

  • Likelihood of using a harm reduction vending machine among rural people who inject drugs in Appalachian Kentucky

    Open Access•April M Young, Tasfia Jahangir et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2025

  • Prevalence and correlates of multiple injections per injection episode among people who inject drugs in rural U.S. communities

    Open Access•L S Mixson, William A Zule et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2025

  • HIV, HCV, and Health-Related Harms Among Women Who Inject Drugs

    Jenny Iversen, Kimberly Page et al.•JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune…•2015

  • Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist

    Open Access•John F P Bridges, A Brett Hauber et al.•Value in Health•2011

  • County-Level Vulnerability Assessment for Rapid Dissemination of HIV or HCV Infections Among Persons Who Inject Drugs, United States

    Michelle M Van Handel, Charles E Rose et al.•JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune…•2016

  • Syringe Service Programs for Persons Who Inject Drugs in Urban, Suburban, and Rural Areas — United States, 2013

    Open Access•Don C Des Jarlais, Ann Nugent et al.•MMWR. Surveillance Summaries•2015

  • Are needle and syringe programmes associated with a reduction in HIV transmission among people who inject drugs

    Esther J Aspinall, Dhanya Nambiar et al.•International Journal of…•2014

  • Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies

    Open Access•Byron J Powell, Rinad S Beidas et al.•The Journal of Behavioral Health…•2017

  • Substance Abuse in Women

    Open Access•Shelly F Greenfield, Sudie E Back et al.•Psychiatric Clinics of North…•2010

  • Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies

    Open Access•Aluísio J D Barros, Aluisio JD Barros et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2003

  • A Modified Poisson Regression Approach to Prospective Studies with Binary Data

    Guangyong Zou•American Journal of Epidemiology•2004

  • Trend Analyses of Users of a Syringe Exchange Program in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Open Access•Laurie Maurer, Laurie A Maurer et al.•AIDS and Behavior•2016

  • Rural risk environments for hepatitis c among young adults in appalachian kentucky

    Open Access•David H Cloud, Umed Ibragimov et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2019

  • Syringe access, syringe sharing, and police encounters among people who inject drugs in New York City

    Open Access•Leo Beletsky, Daliah Heller et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2014

  • The effectiveness and safety of syringe vending machines as a component of needle syringe programmes in community settings

    Open Access•M M Islam, Alex Wodak et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2008

  • People, places, and stigma

    Open Access•Monica Fadanelli, David H Cloud et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2020

  • Effectiveness of sterile needle and syringe programmes

    Open Access•Alex Wodak, Annie Cooney•International Journal of Drug…•2005

  • Gender Differences in Social Network Influence among Injection Drug Users

    Open Access•Melissa Davey-Rothwell, Melissa A Davey-Rothwell et al.•Journal of Urban Health•2007

  • Spatial Access to Sterile Syringes and the Odds of Injecting with an Unsterile Syringe among Injectors

    Open Access•Heather L Cooper, Hannah Cooper et al.•Journal of Urban Health•2012

  • Challenges in Motivating Treatment Enrollment in Community Syringe Exchange Participants

    Michael Kidorf•Journal of Urban Health•2005

  • Women, Harm Reduction and HIV

    Sophie Pinkham, Kasia Malinowska-Sempruch•Reproductive Health Matters•2008

  • Respondent-Driven Sampling II

    Douglas D Heckathorn•Social Problems•2002

  • Respondent-Driven Sampling

    Douglas D Heckathorn•Social Problems•1997

Citations per year2.8
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae