Examining Social Influences on Why We Drink
Perceived Drinking Motives in the Social Network Impact Individuals’ Own Drinking Motives and Alcohol Use
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21645550 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sara Bartel (0000-0002-4607-2670, Dalhousie University, corresponding author), Simon B Sherry (0009-0002-2325-5076, Dalhousie University), Sherry H Stewart (0000-0003-3350-2712, Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 13 |
| Pages | 1931-1939 |
| Publication date | 2022-11-10 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Substance Use & Misuse (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1082-6084 • E-ISSN: 1532-2491 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10826084.2022.2120364 |
| PMID | 36103629 |
| OpenAlex | W4295788639 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 28 |
Introduction: A significant body of research has investigated the impacts of social influence and social selection on binge drinking and risk factors for binge drinking in emerging adults; however, one risk factor for binge drinking that has yet to be thoroughly investigated in this regard is drinking motives. Preliminary research suggests the motives of others may impact emerging adults’ own alcohol use indirectly through their own motives (i.e., social influence). While these are important findings, research to date has been only conducted with adolescents or dyads and has not examined selection (i.e., selecting social network members with similar motives). We filled these gaps with a longitudinal egocentric social network design. Methods: Emerging adults (N = 177) completed measures on their alcohol use, drinking motives, and social networks at baseline (T1) and four-month follow-up (T2). Results: A cross-lagged panel model indicated T1 perceived network drinking motives predicted T2 participant drinking motives (for all motives but social), but T1 participant drinking motives did not predict T2 perceived network drinking motives. Path analysis indicated T1 perceived network drinking motives predicted T2 participant binge drinking frequency indirectly through T2 participant drinking motives for enhancement, coping-with-anxiety, and conformity, but not social or coping-with-depression, motives. Discussion: Results suggests drinking motives of those around emerging adults impact their own drinking motives, and indirectly, their own alcohol use. We found evidence of social influence, but not social selection. Conclusion: It appears that those around emerging adults have the capacity to influence their drinking behaviors and drinking motives
Binge drinking · Conformity · Environmental health · Injury prevention · Poison control · Social support · Structural equation modeling · Suicide prevention · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Clinical Psychology · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Medicine · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Convergence of Structural Equation Modeling and Multilevel Modeling
Psychometric evaluation of the five-factor Modified Drinking Motives Questionnaire — Revised in undergraduates
How Many Imputations are Really Needed? Some Practical Clarifications of Multiple Imputation Theory
The Influence of Drinking Buddies
Accuracy and Bias in Perceptions of why Social Network Members Drink
The “false consensus effect”
Social network changes and life events across the life span
The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |