Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding Public Perception of Naloxone

A Study of FAQs and Answer Source Credibility

Bibliographic Data

ID21645932
AuthorsSydney C Ferrell (0000-0003-4459-7550, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, USA, corresponding author), Matthew C Ferrell (Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, USA), Matthew Ferrell (0000-0003-4799-7760, University of Vermont Medical Center), Cole M Nelson (Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences), Justin S Lippard (Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences), Jason Beaman (0000-0002-6348-196X, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences), Matt Vassar (0000-0003-2859-6152, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences)
Year2024
Volume59
Issue9
Pages1352-1356
Publication date2024-07-28
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSubstance Use & Misuse (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1082-6084 • E-ISSN: 1532-2491
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10826084.2024.2341319
PMID38688898
OpenAlexW4396561340
LanguageEN
References cited11

Purpose The most commonly used intervention for opioid overdoses is naloxone. With naloxone soon to be sold over-the-counter in the United States, the goal of this paper is to categorize frequently asked questions (FAQs) and answers about naloxone using internet sources in a cross-sectional fashion.Methods Terms “narcan” and “naloxone” were searched on a clean Google Chrome browser using the “People also asked” tab to find FAQs and their answer sources. We classified questions and sources and assessed each website’s quality and credibility grading with JAMA benchmark criteria. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to determine variance of mean JAMA score by source type and Post-Hoc Dunn’s test with Bonferroni corrected alpha of 0.005 used to compare source types.Results Of the 305 unique questions, 202 (66.2%) were classified as facts, 78 (25.6%) were policy, and 25 (8.2%) were value. Of the 144 unique answer sources, the two most common included 55 (38.2%) which were government entities and 47 (32.6%) which were commercial entities. Ninety-two (of 144, 63.9%) sources met three or more JAMA benchmark criteria. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the JAMA benchmark scores by source type H(4) = 12.75, p = 0.0126 and between the mean rank of academic and government sources (p = 0.0036).Conclusion We identified FAQs and their citations about naloxone, highlighting potential lack of understanding and knowledge of this important intervention. We recommend updating websites to accurately reflect current and useful information for those that may require naloxone

Categorization · Credibility · Frequently asked questions · Medical education · Opioid · Opioid overdose · Political science · Psychiatry · Computer Science · Medicine · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment · Psychology · Smoking Behavior and Cessation · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

  • Are take‐home naloxone programmes effective? Systematic review utilizing application of the Bradford Hill criteria

    Open Access•Rebecca Mcdonald, John Strang•Addiction•2016

  • Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the Internet

    William M Silberg•JAMA•1997

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae