Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Urine Drug Testing among Opioid-Naïve and Long-Term Opioid Nevada Medicaid Beneficiaries

Bibliographic Data

ID21646098
AuthorsSarah Friedman (0000-0001-7231-2976, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA, corresponding author), Kirtan Patel (0000-0002-2298-224X, Renown Health, Reno, Nevada, USA), Yan Liu (0000-0002-1612-779X, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA), Sarah Hartzell (0000-0002-7041-6891, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA), Michelle S Keller (0000-0002-8157-7586, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center)
Year2020
Volume55
Issue14
Pages2314-2320
Publication date2020-11-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSubstance Use & Misuse (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1082-6084 • E-ISSN: 1532-2491
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10826084.2020.1805467
PMID32835582
OpenAlexW3080097214
LanguageEN
References cited18

Background Current guidelines recommend that, when prescribing opioids, providers use urine drug testing (UDT) for harm reduction. Objective: To identify whether Medicaid beneficiaries in Nevada at increased risk for opioid misuse received UDT. Methods: We used Nevada Medicaid claims data (2017–2018) to describe UDT among three samples: opioid naïve patients (N = 11,326), opioid naïve patients with a second follow-up prescription (N = 8,910), and long-term opioid patients (N = 19,173). Predictors of opioid misuse include past diagnoses of mental health and substance use, demographic characteristics and potentially risky behaviors. Outcomes include receiving UDT prior to opioid prescription among the two naïve samples and within six months for the long-term sample. We report predicted probabilities (PP) from logistic regressions and hazard ratios (HR) and Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: A small percentage of patients received UDT (naïve sample: 2.5%; naïve with a second follow-up prescription sample: 3.5%; long-term sample: 9.9%). Adults with alcohol disorders and other substance use disorders had the highest PP of UDT, among both the naïve (alcohol related disorder: 3.1%; other substance use disorder: 7.7%) and the naïve with a second follow-up prescription (alcohol related disorder: 4.1%; other substance use disorder: 11.7%) samples. Among the long-term sample, similar predictors were significant. Conclusions: Although there was an association between having risk factors for opioid misuse (e.g. past alchohol disorders and other substance use disorder diagnoses) and receiving UDT, the percentage of patients who received UDT was unexpectedly low, pointing to the need to increase guideline adherence and implementation among providers who prescribe opioids

Confidence interval · Hazard ratio · Health care · Medicaid · Medical prescription · Opioid · Opioid use disorder · Psychiatry · Substance abuse · Medicine · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment · Poisoning and overdose treatments · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes · Internal Medicine · Pharmacology

  • Prescription Opioid Use, Misuse, and Use Disorders in U.S. Adults

    Open Access•Beth Han, Wilson M Compton et al.•Annals of Internal Medicine•2017

  • Age and Gender Trends in Long-Term Opioid Analgesic Use for Noncancer Pain

    Cynthia I Campbell, Constance Weisner et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2010

  • Quantifying the Epidemic of Prescription Opioid Overdose Deaths

    Puja Seth, Rose A Rudd et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae