Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Validity of Self-Reported Cannabis Use Based on Urine Toxicology Measures in a Population-Based Pregnancy Cohort in Michigan

Bibliographic Data

ID21646124
AuthorsBan Al-Sahab (0009-0001-4005-1748, Michigan State University, corresponding author), Omayma Alshaarawy (0000-0002-5968-0245, Michigan State University), Kennedy Quinn (Michigan State University), Jean M Kerver (0000-0001-5006-3622, Michigan State University), Kipling M Bohnert (Michigan State University), Audriyana Jaber (Michigan State University), Nigel Paneth (0000-0002-0151-966X, Michigan State University)
Year2026
Pages1-8
Publication date2026-05-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSubstance Use & Misuse (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1082-6084 • E-ISSN: 1532-2491
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10826084.2026.2670606
PMID42116667
OpenAlexW7160902719
LanguageEN
References cited29

BACKGROUND: Prenatal cannabis use may be underreported due to social stigma and fear of legal repercussions. The study assesses the validity of self-reported prenatal cannabis use versus urine toxicology measures and determines correlates of non-disclosure. METHODS: Data are from a statewide population-based pregnancy cohort (MARCH- Michigan Archive for Research on Child Health). Participants were recruited at first prenatal visit from 22 clinics in 2017-2023. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV) of self-reported cannabis use using urine toxicology as the criterion standard. RESULTS: 606 participants who self-reported cannabis use data within 30 days of urine collection were considered for analysis. Self-reports identified a prevalence of 14.2% for prenatal cannabis use, whereas urinalysis prevalence was 19.1%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of self-report were 57.8%, 96.1%, 77.9% and 90.6%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between participants who disclosed and those who did not, except for race and ethnicity. The sensitivity of self-reports among Non-Hispanic Blacks was 45.5% compared to 73.0% for their non-Hispanic White counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reports can underestimate prenatal cannabis use especially among disadvantaged populations. The use of biospecimens to assess cannabis exposure is warranted for reducing misclassification and improving validity in research studies

Cannabis · Cohort · Cohort study · Predictive validity · Pregnancy · Urinalysis · Urine · Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research · Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum · Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects · Epidemiology

  • Detection of Postnatal Depression

    Open Access•J L Cox, J M Holden et al.•The British Journal of Psychiatry•1987

  • Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use Information Among Pregnant Women

    Open Access•Mahek Garg, Laura Garrison et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2015

  • Upending racism in psychological science

    N T Buchanan, Marisol Pérez et al.•American Psychologist•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae