Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Relationship Between State Fiscal Capacity and Opioid Settlement Expenditures

Bibliographic Data

ID21646640
AuthorsZoe Lindenfeld (0000-0002-5456-7665, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, corresponding author), Amanda I Mauri (0000-0002-5327-043X, Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Maryland), Jonathan H Cantor (RAND Corporation), Jonathan Cantor (0000-0003-4468-833X, RAND Corporation), Ryan K McBain (0000-0003-0073-0348, RAND Corporation), Ryan McBain (RAND Corporation), Diana Silver (0000-0002-8135-0306, New York University)
Year2026
Volume61
Issue5
Pages779-782
Publication date2026-04-16
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSubstance Use & Misuse (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1082-6084 • E-ISSN: 1532-2491
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10826084.2025.2571849
PMID41086109
OpenAlexW4415181104
LanguageEN
References cited7

Introduction The distribution of funds from national opioid settlements provides a critical opportunity for states to address the ongoing overdose crisis in the US. However, it remains unclear whether these funds have been spent by states with significant fiscal needs, in addition to higher opioid-related needs.Methods We used data from KFF Health News to examine per capita opioid settlement spending across states, categorizing them into tertiles. Fiscal need, defined as the ability of governments to fund programs and services, was assessed using US Census of Governments data, and overdose crisis need was measured using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention overdose mortality data. We identified states as “higher overdose need” and “higher fiscal need” and calculated the mean per capita settlement funds spent for each category.Results The mean settlement funds spent per capita were $3.45 (SD: 1.75) for tertile 1 (n = 16), $8.11 (SD: 2.04) for tertile 2 (n = 16), and $ 23.69 (SD: 28.12) for tertile 3 (n = 13). Tertile 3 had the highest overdose death rate (23.69, SD: 28.23), while tertile 2 had the highest fiscal need. States categorized as both higher fiscal and overdose need (n = 12) spent a mean of $21.48 (SD: 33.22) per capita, compared to $7.82 (SD: 4.59) in states with lower fiscal and overdose need (n = 21).Conclusions States with higher fiscal and overdose needs spent the most settlement funds per capita in 2022–2023, suggesting effective targeting. Future research should examine whether the opioid settlement funds lead to reductions in overdose deaths, particularly in fiscally constrained areas

Fiscal capacity · Opioid · Opioid abuse · Opioid overdose · Per capita · Gun Ownership and Violence Research · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment

  • Revenue effort of local governments

    Open Access•Huaping Luo, James W Douglas•Journal of Public Budgeting…•1996

  • The Opioid Settlements—Will the First Steps Be in the Right Direction

    Open Access•Sara Whaley, Joshua M Sharfstein et al.•JAMA Health Forum•2023

  • Beyond social determinants

    Open Access•Zoe Lindenfeld, Diana Silver et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2025

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae