Apolos, musas y Parnasos
La controversia sobre la distribución de las obras en los libros de poesíasApollos, Muses, and Parnassus: The Controversy Surrounding Poem Distribution in Poetry Books
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21646867 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Manuel Ángel Candelas Colodrón (0000-0001-5792-5627, Universidade de Vigo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 158-177 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-12 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Calíope (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1084-1490 • E-ISSN: 2377-9551 |
| Publisher | The Pennsylvania State University Press (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5325/caliope.26.1.0158 |
| OpenAlex | W3163680392 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
The article pretends to narrate the process of enrichment of the Parnassus frame during the seventeenth-century(until 1672) and to study the immediate impact of the decision of González de Salas or Quevedo to distributing his poems in nine muses among his contemporary poets. In particular, our study examines the decision of three poets that can be deemed peripheric, but that will cultivate this generic distinction, albeit not without some degree of controversy or reflection from Lisbon, Francisco Manuel de Melo; from Amsterdam, Miguel de Barrios; and from Cagliari (José Delitala)
Art · Humanities · Literature · Poetry · Early Modern Spanish Literature · Historical and Literary Analyses · Spanish Literature and Culture Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|