Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Application of the Process‐Oriented and Machine Learning Combined Model in Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon of Non‐Waterlogged Mineral Soils at National Scale

Bibliographic Data

ID21647418
AuthorsKeqiang Wang (0009-0001-5157-2565, College of Geographical and Remote Sciences Xinjiang University Urumqi China), Zipeng Zhang (0009-0000-2286-8159, College of Geographical and Remote Sciences Xinjiang University Urumqi China, corresponding author), Jianli Ding (0000-0002-5024-931X, Xinjiang Institute of Technology Aksu China), Liangyi Li (0009-0000-7764-3694, College of Geographical and Remote Sciences Xinjiang University Urumqi China), Jinhua Cao (0009-0001-8532-4332, College of Geographical and Remote Sciences Xinjiang University Urumqi China), Zhiran Zhou (College of Geographical and Remote Sciences Xinjiang University Urumqi China), Xiangyu Ge (0009-0008-2341-8051, College of Geographical and Remote Sciences Xinjiang University Urumqi China), Chaolei Yang (0009-0007-0420-4413, Kunming General Survey of Natural Resources Center China Geological Survey Kunming China), Jingzhe Wang (0000-0001-8332-7997, School of Artificial Intelligence Shenzhen Polytechnic University Shenzhen China)
Year2026
Volume37
Issue3
Pages912-929
Publication date2026-02-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.70150
OpenAlexW4413448115
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited85

Integrating process‐oriented (PO) and machine learning (ML) models is effective for obtaining dynamic spatial information on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. However, PO‐ML integration, particularly at large scales, has received insufficient attention. This gap limits our understanding of and predictive capabilities regarding SOC dynamics. To explore the adaptability and effectiveness of PO‐ML integration on a large scale, we constructed a national‐scale PO‐ML hybrid model. Due to the uncertainty in estimating natural land cover types, we used the PO model to expand the time series of nationwide non‐waterlogged mineral soil natural land cover SOC density data (excluding wetland and croplands) for the period 2000–2014 to enhance the ML model training data and predict the spatial distribution of the average SOC content during this period. The results indicated that the ML model's accuracy ( R 2 = 0.57) aligned with the average level reported by other digital soil mapping (DSM) studies, whereas the accuracy of the PO‐ML hybrid model was approximately 17% above the highest accuracy reported in other DSM studies. This improvement highlights the advancement our research contributes to the field. Furthermore, the study demonstrates the important role of dynamic environmental covariates in predicting SOC density by showing that they significantly enhanced the model's ability to capture the spatiotemporal dynamics of SOC. Moreover, in the absence of Rothamsted carbon model simulation data, the ML model exhibited higher uncertainty in the sample‐scarce western regions and around the latitudes of 30° N–40° N, whereas the PO‐ML model effectively reduced this uncertainty. These findings indicate that the hybrid model strategy offers significant advantages in SOC simulation and provides important insights into the nationwide spatiotemporal distribution of SOC in non‐waterlogged mineral soils' natural land cover

Algorithm · Carbon fibers · Cartography · Earth science · Geography · Metallurgy · Mineral · Soil carbon · Soil water · Total organic carbon · Chemistry · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Materials Science · Soil and Land Suitability Analysis · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping · Environmental Chemistry · Geology · Soil Science

  • Soil Organic Matter in Rocky Mountainous Area of Northern China

    Open Access•Y Q Li, Yingzi Li et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2026

  • Stop “Vandalising” Earth to Assist the Planet “Thrive”

    Open Access•Anquan Xia, Tong Li et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2026

  • SoilGrids 2.0

    Open Access•Laura Poggio, Luis M de Sousa et al.•SOIL•2021

  • Global Carbon Budget 2021

    Open Access•Pierre Friedlingstein, Matthew W Jones et al.•Earth System Science Data•2022

  • Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change

    Open Access•W M Post, K C Kwon•Global Change Biology•2000

  • Global Carbon Budget 2020

    Open Access•Pierre Friedlingstein, Mike O’Sullivan et al.•Earth System Science Data•2020

  • Model-Dependent Variance Inflation Factor Cutoff Values

    Trevor A Craney, James G Surles•Quality Engineering•2002

  • SoilGrids250m

    Open Access•Tomislav Hengl, Jorge Mendes de Jesus et al.•PLoS ONE•2017

  • Km monthly temperature and precipitation dataset for China from 1901 to 2017

    Open Access•Shouzhang Peng, Yongxia Ding et al.•Earth System Science Data•2019

  • The ERA5 global reanalysis

    Open Access•Hans Hersbach, Bill Bell et al.•Quarterly Journal of the Royal…•2020

  • Random Forests

    Open Access•Leo Breiman•Machine Learning•2001

Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae