Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Interspecific Trade‐Offs Between Intercrops Promote Soil Resilience, Agricultural Productivity, and Crop Protection

A Meta‐Synthesis

Bibliographic Data

ID21647480
AuthorsAhmad Latif Virk (0000-0002-1558-9642, State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geo‐Environment Protection, College of Ecology and Environment Chengdu University of Technology Chengdu China, corresponding author), Naeem Ahmad (0000-0002-5023-8362, College of Agronomy Northwest A&F University Yangling China), Muhammad Saleem Arif (0000-0003-1247-0539, Department of Environmental Sciences Government College University Faisalabad Faisalabad Pakistan), Zheng‐Rong Kan (0000-0002-2175-4675, Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, College of Agriculture Nanjing Agricultural University Nanjing China), Jianying Qi (0000-0001-5725-7817, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agricultural Bioresources, College of Agriculture South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China), Awais Shakoor (0000-0001-9273-4500, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia)
Year2026
Volume37
Issue9
Pages3880-3889
Publication date2026-05-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.70348
OpenAlexW7109553074
LanguageEN
References cited77

Intercropping (IC) increases crop productivity by improving soil ecosystem functions and agroecosystem resilience to climatic vulnerabilities, thereby contributing to sustainable agriculture. However, quantitative metrics for assessing IC's role in promoting soil ecosystem functions and agroecosystem stability are not yet widely adopted due to perceived challenges. To address this, we conducted a systematic assessment of 21 meta‐analyses to evaluate the overall effects of IC on crop productivity, soil nutrients, microbial abundance, greenhouse gas emissions, and crop protection measures. Our results have shown that IC significantly improved land use efficiency and yield production compared to monocropping. However, IC did not have a positive impact on soil nutrients except for SOC compared to monocropping. Notably, fungal and bacterial abundance were significantly increased under IC, suggesting a belowground microbial facilitation process. Moreover, our results indicate that pest and disease incidence were reduced under IC compared to monocropping. Specifically, legume‐based IC greatly decreased disease incidence and increased predator abundance. These results highlight the significant potential of IC to enhance soil ecosystem functions and sustainability, particularly regarding crop yield, microbial abundance, and the biological control of pests and disease incidence. However, the limited effects of IC on soil nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and N 2 O mitigation highlight the need for further investigations under different soil types and climatic conditions

Agricultural productivity · Agriculture · Agroecosystem · Crop · Crop yield · Ecosystem · Intercropping · Nutrient · Productivity · Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems · Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems · Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae