Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Quantifying the efficiency of soil conservation and optimized strategies

A case‐study in a hotspot of afforestation in the Loess Plateau

Bibliographic Data

ID21647963
AuthorsJiachen Ning (College of Economics and Management Northwest A & F University Yangling China), Daojun Zhang (0000-0001-6890-9083, College of Economics and Management Northwest A & F University Yangling China, corresponding author), Qiang Yu (0000-0002-0695-1603, State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University Yangling China)
Year2021
Volume32
Issue3
Pages1114-1126
Publication date2021-02-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.3730
OpenAlexW3044927721
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited67

Although it is generally believed the Grain for Green programme (GFG) implemented in China has attenuated soil erosion, the extent to which it is effective still needs verification. Taking Yan'an in the Loess Plateau as the study area, we analysed both total effect and efficiency differences during GFG implementation. Results showed that, while soil erosion on average decreased from 4,884.49 to 4,087.57 t km −2 yr −1 , counties with higher GFG implementation intensity achieved a lower soil conservation effect. For example, Wuqi ranks third in the GFG implementation intensity among all counties in Yan'an, but its actual soil erosion reduction is the lowest, only 54.1% of Yan'an's average level. To analyse the reason for the efficiency difference, the concept of soil conservation potential was proposed. It is concluded that the soil conservation effect is controlled by the soil conservation potential. Ideally, regions with high soil conservation potential should get priority in the GFG application, yet there is a significant spatial mismatch between the GFG implementation intensity and the soil conservation potential because the correlation coefficient is only −0.05, which weakened the soil control effect. A dynamic implementation mechanism was put forward for the formulation and optimization of ecological programmes and projects in future: first, using the soil conservation potential to determine the implementation intensity in each region; second, adjusting the intensity to the changes of the soil conservation potential in the following implementation; third, repeating above steps to ensure high efficiency of soil erosion control, and achieving the sustainability and effectiveness of the ecological projects

Agricultural engineering · Agroforestry · Biology · Erosion · Erosion control · Geomorphology · Grassland · Loess plateau · Physics · Soil conservation · Engineering · Environmental Science · Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies · Soil erosion and sediment transport · Ecology · Geology · Soil Science

  • Agricultural production efficiency estimation and spatiotemporal convergence characteristic analysis in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

    Open Access•Baishu Guo, Dawei He et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2023

  • A novel framework for evaluating the effect of vegetation restoration via grazing exclusion by fencing

    Open Access•Wanjing Yang, Daojun Zhang et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2022

  • The influence of agricultural industrial policy on non-grain production of cultivated land

    Open Access•Qi Yang, Daojun Zhang•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Socio-ecological changes on the Loess Plateau of China after Grain to Green Program

    Open Access•Xutong Wu, Shuai Wang et al.•The Science of The Total…•2019

  • Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China

    Open Access•Bojie Fu, Yu Liu et al.•Ecological Complexity•2011

  • Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes

    Open Access•Shuai Wang, Bojie Fu et al.•Nature Geoscience•2016

  • China's Grain for Green Program has reduced soil erosion in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River and the middle reaches of the Yellow River

    Zixuan Zhou, Z C Zhou et al.•International Journal of…•2009

  • Ecological restoration programs and payments for ecosystem services as integrated biophysical and socioeconomic processes—China's experience as an example

    Open Access•Runsheng Yin, Minjuan Zhao•Ecological Economics•2012

  • The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe

    Open Access•Panos Panagos, Pasquale Borrelli et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2015

  • Simulating the impacts of future land use change on soil erosion in the Kasilian watershed, Iran

    Open Access•Mohammad Zare, Τhomas Panagopoulos et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Assessing the coordination of ecological and agricultural goals during ecological restoration efforts

    Open Access•Daojun Zhang, Qiqi Jia et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • A linkage between the biophysical and the economic

    Open Access•Martina Sartori, George Philippidis et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Evaluating the vegetation restoration potential achievement of ecological projects

    Open Access•Xin Xu, Daojun Zhang et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

Citations per year0.6
Citation span2021 - 2023 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae