Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Multiple Environmental Variables as Covariates to Improve the Accuracy of Spatial Prediction Models for SOM on Karst Aera

Bibliographic Data

ID21648201
AuthorsYongcheng Jiang (0000-0001-7257-7915, College of Resources and Environmental Engineering Guizhou University Guiyang China), Fupeng Li (0000-0002-3329-1989, College of Resources and Environmental Engineering Guizhou University Guiyang China), Yufeng Gong (0000-0003-0057-7945, College of Resources and Environmental Engineering Guizhou University Guiyang China), Xiuyuan Yang (0000-0002-2703-4433, College of Resources and Environmental Engineering Guizhou University Guiyang China), Guiting Mu (0009-0004-6270-6073, College of Resources and Environmental Engineering Guizhou University Guiyang China, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume36
Issue5
Pages1656-1666
Publication date2025-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.5454
OpenAlexW4406293368
LanguageEN
References cited34

Aims accurately predicting the spatial distribution of soil organic matter (SOM) is essential for environmental management and carbon storage estimation. However, the diversity of sources of variables poses a challenge in studying the spatial distribution of SOM. Methods in order to address this issue, we propose leveraging multiple environmental variables and employing machine learning models, specifically Lightweight gradient boosting machine learning (LightGBM) and random forest (RF), for predicting SOM spatial distribution. 128 soil samples were collected from the Caohai National Nature Reserve, and their SOM content was measured. Results the study found that the average SOM content was 36.75 g/kg. Compared to traditional linear regression models such as ordinary kriging (OK), ordinary least squares (OLS), and geographically weighted regression (GWR), the machine learning models based on nonlinear regression, LightGBM and RF, demonstrated higher cross‐validated coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.62 and 0.60, respectively, outperforming the other models. Additionally, RF exhibited lower mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE), indicating higher stability and generalization capability. The spatial distribution of SOM among the models showed consistency, with higher SOM content observed in southern and near‐Caohai Lake regions and lower SOM content in northern and farther regions from Caohai Lake. Results from the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) model highlighted agricultural land (AL), pH, and Elevation (ELV) as primary covariates influencing SOM spatial distribution. Conclusions this study provides valuable insights and support for environmental management and carbon storage estimation in the karst plateau region

Cluster analysis · Covariate · Kriging · Mean squared error · Ordinary least squares · Predictive modelling · Random forest · Self-organizing map · Statistics · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Mathematics · Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping · Artificial Intelligence

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae