Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effects of Eucalypt Monoculture Plantations on Soil Invertebrate Communities

A Meta‐Analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID21648264
AuthorsRaquel Juan‐Ovejero (0000-0002-1686-4167, Centre for Functional Ecology, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Department of Life Sciences University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal, corresponding author), Marie Luise Carolina Bartz (0000-0003-3637-8075, Centre for Functional Ecology, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Department of Life Sciences University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal), Dilmar Baretta (0000-0001-8219-1362, Department of Animal Science Santa Catarina State University (UDESC Oeste) Chapecó SC Brazil), José Paulo Sousa (0000-0001-8045-4296, Centre for Functional Ecology, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Department of Life Sciences University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal), Verônica Ferreira (0000-0001-7688-2626, MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ARNET – Aquatic Research Network, Department of Life Sciences University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal)
Year2025
Volume36
Issue4
Pages1310-1325
Publication date2025-02-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.5431
OpenAlexW4405481782
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited79

Eucalypt monoculture plantations can adversely impact soil properties. However, a thorough assessment of their effects on soil invertebrate communities is lacking, impeding our ability to acquire a deeper understanding about the potential impacts of these intensively managed plantations on soil functioning. To quantify the effects of eucalypt plantations on soil invertebrate communities, and to identify the main moderators driving these effects, we performed a meta‐analysis of studies reporting the effects of eucalypt monoculture plantations in comparison with other land use types involving different potential levels of disturbance to the soil matrix (native forests, other forestry plantations, croplands, grasslands, integrated crop‐livestock‐forestry, and invasive copses). We addressed these effects on the density (26 studies contributing 143 comparisons) and diversity (14 studies contributing 168 comparisons) of soil invertebrates. Density was lower in eucalypt plantations than in other forestry plantations, but higher than in grasslands and integrated crop‐livestock‐forestry. Diversity was lower in eucalypt plantations compared to native forests, yet higher when compared with other forestry plantations. When compared with other forestry plantations, the effects of eucalypt plantations on soil invertebrates depended on the type of other forestry plantation, the mean annual temperature, and the annual precipitation. Accounting for the diverse effects of eucalypt plantations relative to other land uses and climatic factors, along with the integration of data on soil physico‐chemical properties and different management practices, can contribute to a better understanding of how changes in land cover impact soil invertebrates and help managers to make informed decisions about the establishment of eucalypt plantations

Agroforestry · Biology · Geography · Invertebrate · Monoculture · Ecology and Conservation Studies · Environmental Science · Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology · Ecology · Forestry

  • Afforestation with River red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) drives biotic homogenization in coastal sand dunes

    Open Access•Aviv Avisar, Jay Aronson et al.•Trees Forests and People•2025

  • Ggplot2

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham•Ggplot2•2016

  • Introduction to Meta‐Analysis

    Open Access•Michael Borenstein, Larry V Hedges et al.•Introduction to Meta-Analysis•2009

  • The Meta-Analysis of Response Ratios in Experimental Ecology

    Open Access•Larry V Hedges, Jessica Gurevitch et al.•Ecology•1999

  • A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis

    Sue Duval, Richard Tweedie et al.•Journal of the American…•2000

  • WorldClim 2

    Open Access•Stephen E Fick, Robert J Hijmans•International Journal of…•2017

  • Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package

    Open Access•Wolfgang Viechtbauer•Journal of Statistical Software•2010

  • Net carbon accounting and reporting are a barrier to understanding the mitigation value of forest protection in developed countries

    Open Access•Brendan Mackey, William R Moomaw et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 Main Report

    Open Access•Alexander S Mather, Alexander Mather•Land Use Policy•2003

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae