Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Land management to reconcile ecosystem services supply and demand mismatches—A case study in Shanghai municipality, China

Bibliographic Data

ID21648412
AuthorsBo Jiang (0000-0002-2337-2486, Changjiang Water Resources Protection Institute Wuhan China), Yang Bai (0000-0003-0800-2599, Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences China, corresponding author), Junyu Chen (0000-0002-3462-7560, School of Business Suzhou University of Science and Technology Suzhou China), Juha M Alatalo (0000-0001-5084-850X, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences Qatar University Doha Qatar), Xibao Xu (0000-0002-1448-8292, Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing China), Gang Liu (0000-0003-2613-7286, State Key Laboratory of Hydrology Water Resource and Hydraulic Engineering Hohai University Nanjing China), Qing Wang (0009-0003-7328-8762, Institute of Applied Ecology Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences Shanghai China)
Year2020
Volume31
Issue17
Pages2684-2699
Publication date2020-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.3614
OpenAlexW3014077362
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited56

City managers need to understand how land use and land cover (LULC) change in an urban landscape can affect future land degradation and conditions for ecosystem services (ESs) supply and demand. Optimal land use and land management requires explicit spatial mapping of ESs supply and demand under alternative land use scenarios. In this study, we applied spatially explicit models to predict changes in ESs supply and demand, and their coupling mechanisms, under one baseline scenario and three stakeholder‐defined LULC change scenarios (developed, planning, policy) in Shanghai municipality, China. The results suggest that the policy scenario could significantly increase ESs supply and restore degraded urban areas, but would not guarantee that supply meets demand for four key ESs tested: water retention, particulate matter removal, carbon sequestration, and recreation. However, the policy scenario significantly reduced the shortfalls and spatial mismatches in water retention, particulate matter removal and recreation services, and also greatly restored deficit areas for all four ESs. This is valuable scientific evidence that ESs supply and demand information can be incorporated into urban land management planning in a spatially explicit manner, in order to control or prevent future potential land degradation

Business · Civil engineering · Demand management · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Environmental economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Land degradation · Land management · Land use · Natural resource economics · Recreation · Spatial planning · Supply and demand · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Engineering · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Urban Green Space and Health

  • Integrating Spatial Heterogeneity into an Analysis between Ecosystem Service Value and Its Driving Factors

    Open Access•Yuqing Zhao, Zenglin Han et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Ecosystem Services Supply-Demand and Influencing Factors

    Open Access•Li Ming, Ming Li et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Assessing Ecosystem Services Supply-Demand (Mis)Matches for Differential City Management in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration

    Open Access•Wenbo Cai, Wei Jiang et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • A spatially explicit framework for assessing ecosystem service supply risk under multiple land‐use scenarios in the Xi'an Metropolitan Area of China

    Open Access•Lixian Peng, Liwei Zhang et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2024

  • Recovery capacity and ecological restoration strategy of urban green space based on the self‐organization–resilience model

    Open Access•Wuyang Hong, Dong Han et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2024

  • Changes in ecosystem services supply–demand and key drivers in Jiangsu Province, China, from 2000 to 2020

    Open Access•Yuling Wen, Manchun Li et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2024

  • Guiding and constraining reclamation for coastal zone through identification of response thresholds for ecosystem services supply–demand relationships

    Open Access•Chenghao Liu, Xiaolu Yan et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2024

  • Driving Mechanisms of Supply–Demand Imbalance in Key Ecosystem Services in Dust Storm‐Prone Areas

    Open Access•Shiqi Yu, Zhaohui Zhang•Land Degradation and Development•2026

  • Trade-offs of landscape connectivity between regional and interregional ecological security patterns in a junction area of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region

    Open Access•Menglin Liu, Jian Peng et al.•Applied Geography•2024

  • Nature's hand in megacity cluster progress

    Open Access•Changgao Cheng, Zhou Fang et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2024

  • Achieving the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services through zoning regulation based on land use thresholds

    Open Access•Xiaoqing Zhao, Yifei Xu et al.•Land Use Policy•2024

  • Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP Discover from 1 km AVHRR data

    Thomas R Loveland, Bradley C Reed et al.•International Journal of Remote…•2000

  • Modeling the Spatial Dynamics of Regional Land Use

    Open Access•Peter H Verburg, Welmoed Soepboer et al.•Environmental Management•2002

  • Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales

    Open Access•Erik Nelson, Guillermo Mendoza et al.•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2009

  • Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union

    Open Access•Joachim Maes, Benis N Egoh et al.•Ecosystem Services•2012

  • Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services

    Open Access•Edward M Bennett, Glen D Peterson et al.•Ecology Letters•2009

  • Freshwater biodiversity

    Open Access•David Dudgeon, Angela H Arthington et al.•Biological Reviews•2006

  • Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow

    Open Access•Amy M Villamagna, Paul L Angermeier et al.•Ecological Complexity•2013

  • Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital

    Open Access•Zhiyun Ouyang, Hua Zheng et al.•Science•2016

  • Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning

    Open Access•Yang Bai, Christina P Wong et al.•Nature Communications•2018

  • Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets

    Open Access•Benjamin Burkhard, Franziska Kroll et al.•Ecological Indicators•2012

  • The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability

    Open Access•B L Turner, Eric F Lambin et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2007

  • A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation

    Open Access•Kenneth J Bagstad, D J Semmens et al.•Ecosystem Services•2013

  • Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions

    Open Access•Anne D Guerry, Stephen Polasky et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2015

  • Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions

    Open Access•Joseph Goldstein, Joshua H Goldstein et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2012

  • Getting the measure of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Belinda Reyers, Reinette Biggs et al.•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2013

  • Mapping the world's degraded lands

    Open Access•Holly Gibbs, H K Gibbs et al.•Applied Geography•2015

  • Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA

    Open Access•R Gil Pontius, Laura C Schneider et al.•Agriculture, Ecosystems &…•2001

  • Mapping ecosystem services demand

    Open Access•Sarah Wolff, Catharina J E Schulp et al.•Ecological Indicators•2015

  • Science for managing ecosystem services

    Open Access•R Carpenter, Stephen R Carpenter et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2009

  • Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses

    Open Access•Jeffrey Sayer, Terry Sunderland et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities

    Open Access•Rennie Naidoo, Andrew Balmford et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2008

  • The causes of land-use and land-cover change

    Open Access•Eric F Lambin, B L Turner et al.•Global Environmental Change•2001

  • Quantifying Spatial Variation in Ecosystem Services Demand

    Open Access•Sarah Wolff, Catharina J E Schulp et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • Notes from the field

    Open Access•Mary Ruckelshaus, Emily McKenzie et al.•Ecological Economics•2013

  • Detection Theory

    Neil A Macmillan, C Douglas Creelman•Detection Theory•2004

  • Assessing ecosystem services for informing land-use decisions

    Open Access•Johannes Förster, Jan Barkmann et al.•Conservation Ecology•2015

Unique citing works11
Citations per year2,2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae