Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Disentangling effects of local and landscape variables on attractiveness of restored gravel‐sand pits for bat foraging activities

Bibliographic Data

ID21648676
AuthorsChristian Kerbiriou (0000-0001-6080-4762, Center for Ecology and Conservation Science, UMR7204‐MNHN‐CNRS‐Sorbonne Université Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle 75000 Paris France, corresponding author), Marion Parisot‐Laprun (Association ROSELIERE 77130 Misy‐Sur‐Yonne France)
Year2020
Volume31
Issue16
Pages2329-2339
Publication date2020-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.3604
OpenAlexW3011029943
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited68

Despite the impacts of extraction activities, quarries have great potential for conservation of biodiversity, and their restoration can be considered a major task in restoration ecology. A particularly important issue is to quantify the roles of the following various factors that may influence biodiversity and restoration success: (a) local variables, (b) landscape variables and (c) ecological management. Following a multi‐model inference, we identify which variables were the most useful predictors of bat activity in gravel‐sand pits. We used data from 21 French gravel‐sand pits provided by the biodiversity‐monitoring scheme, ROSELIERE. Our results suggest that within these restored gravel‐sand pits, landscape variables appear to be better predictors of the attractiveness of restored gravel‐sand pits for the foraging activity of bats than local variables. Species or community indexes appeared to be more sensitive to landscape variables measured at a large scale (i.e., 1,000 m). Among local variables, the time elapsed after operation was a better predictor of bat foraging activity than the description of the habitat itself. The effect was more obvious within a site with an elapsed time since operation greater than 10 years. Our findings suggest that to increase the attractiveness of gravel‐sand pits for bat foraging activities, planning policies should consider not only the intrinsic characteristics of a project (i.e., local variables) but also the surrounding environment (i.e., landscape variables)

Attractiveness · Biodiversity · Biology · Foraging · Geography · Habitat · Restoration Ecology · Variables · Bat Biology and Ecology Studies · Environmental Science · Mathematics · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation · Ecology

  • Calculation of biodiversity level between different land-uses to improve conservation outcomes of biodiversity offsetting

    Open Access•Lara Millon, Kévin Barré et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R

    Open Access•Alain F Zuur, Alain Zuur et al.•Mixed Effects Models and…•2009

  • Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets

    Open Access•Bruce A McKenney, Bruce McKenney et al.•Environmental Management•2010

  • Generalized Collinearity Diagnostics

    John Fox, Georges Monette•Journal of the American…•1992

  • Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions

    Open Access•Catherine E Grueber, Shinichi Nakagawa et al.•Journal of Evolutionary Biology•2011

  • Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data

    Open Access•Carsten F Dormann, Jana M Mcpherson et al.•Ecography•2007

  • Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients

    Open Access•Holger Schielzeth•Methods in Ecology and Evolution•2010

  • AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology

    Open Access•Kenneth P Burnham, David R Anderson et al.•Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology•2011

  • Contribution of private gardens to habitat availability, connectivity and conservation of the common pipistrelle in Paris

    Open Access•Anne Mimet, Christian Kerbiriou et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2020

  • No net loss of biodiversity or paper offsets? A critical review of the French no net loss policy

    Open Access•Fabien Quétier, Baptiste Regnery et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2014

  • Biodiversity offset markets

    Open Access•Anne‐Charlotte Vaissière, Anne-Charlotte Vaissière et al.•Ecological Economics•2015

  • Ecological Restoration of Central European Mining Sites

    Karel Prach, Klara Řehounková et al.•Landscape Research•2011

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae