Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Identifying the flow paths and beneficiary ranges of the sand fixation service

A case‐study in Xilingol League, China

Bibliographic Data

ID21648729
AuthorsDuanyang Xu (0000-0002-6059-7190, Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science Beijing PR China, corresponding author), Yue Zhang (0000-0003-1198-882X, Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science Beijing PR China)
Year2022
Volume33
Issue3
Pages413-424
Publication date2022-02-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.4127
OpenAlexW3208113839
LanguageEN
References cited64

The sand fixation service (SFS) is a function of vegetation ecosystems whereby sand is restrained and stabilized. It not only generates ecological benefits for local areas but also affects circulation media such as wind and has an impact on surrounding areas. Therefore, it is urgent to study the flow process and influence of the SFS, so as to provide a theoretical basis for cross‐regional ecological compensation. We chose Xilingol League (shorten as "Xilingol") as the study area and used the hybrid single‐particle Lagrangian integrated trajectory (HYSPLIT) model to comprehensively identify the spatial flow paths (FPs) and beneficiary ranges (BRs) of the SFS from 2000 to 2018. The results showed that there were 726 FPs of the SFS, which were mainly distributed in spring, accounting for 63.50% of the total FPs. The total area of the BRs was 279.50 × 10 4 km 2 , accounting for 29.15% of China's land area. The high‐frequency BRs were mainly distributed in the southeast of Inner Mongolia, northern Hebei, northern Liaoning, northern Beijing, and northwestern Jilin. In terms of BRs, farmland was the largest (92.09 × 10 4 km 2 ) land cover type, accounting for 34.51% of the total area of the BRs, and the total beneficiary population and gross domestic product accounting for 44.53% and 50.06% of whole China in 2015. Identification of FPs and BRs of SFS in this study could provide a reference to make ecology compensation policy at national level

China · Environmental protection · Geography · Land cover · Land use · Physical geography · Population · Vineyard · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Soil erosion and sediment transport · Ecology · Geology

  • Global Desertification

    Open Access•James F Reynolds, Mark Stafford‐Smith et al.•Science•2007

  • Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Ralf-Uwe Syrbe, Ralf‐Uwe Syrbe et al.•Ecological Indicators•2012

  • Biological Feedbacks in Global Desertification

    Open Access•William H Schlesinger, James F Reynolds et al.•Science•1990

  • The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital

    Open Access•R Costanza, Ralph C D’arge et al.•Nature•1997

  • Spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of the potential wind erosion rate in the Hexi region, PR China

    Open Access•Jinkuo Lin, Qingyu Guan et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2021

  • The Spatio-Temporal Disparities of Areas Benefitting from the Wind Erosion Prevention Service

    Open Access•Jie Xu, Yu Xiao et al.•International Journal of…•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae