Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluating Water‐Induced Soil Erosion Using Machine Learning

XGBoost as the Most Effective Model

Bibliographic Data

ID21649010
AuthorsIhtisham Khan (0009-0002-2694-1426, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology Wrocław University of Science and Technology Wrocław Poland), Kashif Khan (0009-0004-1174-4504, School of Geosciences and Info‐Physics Central South University Changsha China), Kazimierz Bęcek (0000-0003-1532-9725, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology Wrocław University of Science and Technology Wrocław Poland, corresponding author), Muhammad Fahad Bilal (Centre for Geographical Information System University of the Punjab Lahore Pakistan)
Year2026
Volume37
Issue3
Pages946-960
Publication date2026-02-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.70152
OpenAlexW4413768440
LanguageEN
References cited38

Soil erosion is a significant environmental concern that threatens agricultural activities, reduces soil fertility, and eventually impacts productivity. Assessing soil erosion is essential for effective planning and conservation initiatives in a basin or watershed. This study evaluates water‐induced soil erosion susceptibility using machine learning models, with a focus on the comparative performance of Random Forest (RF), k‐Nearest Neighbors (kNN), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Unlike conventional approaches, this study emphasizes the effectiveness of ML‐based predictive modeling, rather than re‐identifying well‐established erosion‐controlling factors. A comprehensive dataset comprising topographic, climatic, and land use parameters was used to train and validate the models (80% training, 20% testing). The models were assessed based on multiple performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, Kappa coefficient, and area under the curve (AUC). Among the tested models, XGBoost demonstrated the highest predictive performance with an AUC of 0.91, sensitivity of 0.91, specificity of 0.89, and a Kappa index of 0.80. RF and kNN also performed well, with AUC values of 0.87 and 0.89, and Kappa values of 0.80 and 0.73, respectively. Field validation showed that XGBoost correctly predicted 78.7% of high‐risk erosion sites. The final susceptibility map classified 21.3% of the area as high‐risk, mainly concentrated in steep, sparsely vegetated uplands. These findings confirm the effectiveness of machine learning—particularly XGBoost—for accurate erosion risk mapping in data‐scarce, topographically diverse regions. The findings contribute to sustainable land management strategies, offering a scalable and adaptable approach for erosion risk assessment in diverse environmental settings

Erosion · Geomorphology · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Groundwater and Watershed Analysis · Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes · Soil erosion and sediment transport · Geology

  • Random Forests for Classification in Ecology

    Open Access•D Richard Cutler, Thomas C Edwards et al.•Ecology•2007

  • Impact assessment of land cover and land use changes on soil erosion changes (2005–2015) in Pakistan

    Open Access•Hammad Gilani, Adeel Ahmad et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2022

  • The evolution of river systems under the influence of climate change and human activities in the endorheic zones during the Holocene

    Open Access•Mingjun Gao, Yu Li et al.•The Holocene•2024

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae