Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Trade‐Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Urban Agglomeration on the Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains

A Perspective of Socio‐Ecological Drivers

Bibliographic Data

ID21649702
AuthorsJ Chen (0000-0002-0156-9237, Hohai University), Yan Sun (0000-0001-7588-8444, School of Public Administration Hohai University Nanjing China), Zhanbin Luo (0000-0002-2470-7620, School of Public Administration Hohai University Nanjing China), Jing Ma (0000-0002-3306-8525, School of Public Administration Hohai University Nanjing China), Yongjun Yang (0000-0002-0131-439X, School of Environment and Spatial Informatics China University of Mining and Technology Xuzhou China), Fu Chen (0000-0002-9145-6702, School of Public Administration Hohai University Nanjing China, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume36
Issue12
Pages4226-4247
Publication date2025-07-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.5631
OpenAlexW4409959254
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited84

Understanding the combined impacts of socio‐ecological drivers on trade‐offs and synergies between ecosystem services (EST/ESS) is vital for stakeholders in regional planning and governance. However, limited knowledge of the underlying mechanisms hinders our ability to assess the impact of socio‐ecological drivers configurations on EST/ESS during processes of regional natural and social progress. In this study, we established a comprehensive research model for delineating functional areas predicated on the geographic distribution of ecosystem services (ESs) to explore the mechanisms of the interrelationships among socio‐ecological drivers and EST/ESS. First, we quantified the spatiotemporal distributions of four ES indicators from 2000 to 2020 and determined three distinct functional zones grounded in ecosystem service bundles (ESBs) and regional EST/ESS relationships. Significant spatial heterogeneity of the EST/ESS occurred throughout the study area. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to explore the mechanisms through which the socio‐ecological drivers affected the EST/ESS, and it was found that the mechanisms and magnitudes of these influences varied significantly among the identified functional zones. Natural, physical, and biological factors, along with socioeconomic and climate factors, were found to directly or indirectly affect the EST/ESS through mediating variables such as vegetation cover and landscape configuration. Based on these findings, this study provides actionable guidance for regional zoning and management policies aimed at achieving balanced and sustainable development of ecological and social systems. Conducted in the urban agglomeration on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains, this study offers valuable practical references for the sustainable growth of large‐scale urban agglomerations in China and globally

Biology · Business · Economic geography · Economic growth · Economics · Economies of agglomeration · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Environmental resource management · Geography · Urban agglomeration · Computer Science · Environmental Quality and Pollution · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Urban Green Space and Health · Ecology

  • Ecosystem services and land use change research in the mountain regions of China

    Open Access•Zhengxin Zhang, Xiaogang Shi et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Nonlinear Impact of Socio‐Ecological Drivers on Ecosystem Service Trade‐Offs in the P oyang L ake B asin

    Open Access•Xiwen Liang, Miaomiao Xie et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2026

  • Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes

    Open Access•Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne, Glen D Peterson et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2010

  • Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services

    Open Access•Edward M Bennett, Glen D Peterson et al.•Ecology Letters•2009

  • A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions

    Open Access•Prajal Pradhan, Luís Costa et al.•Earth's Future•2017

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment

    Open Access•Stephen R Carpenter, Ruth Defries et al.•Science•2006

  • The Analysis of Mechanisms and Their Contingencies

    Open Access•Andrew F Hayes, Amanda Kay Montoya et al.•Australasian Marketing Journal•2017

  • Global modeling of nature’s contributions to people

    Open Access•Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer, Richard Sharp et al.•Science•2019

  • The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital

    Open Access•R Costanza, Ralph C D’arge et al.•Nature•1997

  • Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)

    Open Access•Joe F Hair Jr, Joe F Hair et al.•European Business Review•2014

  • Contrasting relationships between socio-economic status and avian ecosystem service provision in a developing world city

    Open Access•Chevonne Reynolds, Caroline Howes et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2023

  • Spatial correlation between the changes of ecosystem service supply and demand

    Open Access•Zihan Xu, Jian Peng et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2022

  • CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting

    Open Access•Ganesh Dash, Justin Paul•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • The relationship evolution between urbanization and urban ecological resilience in the Northern Slope Economic Belt of Tianshan Mountains, China

    Open Access•Kewen Wang, Haitao Ma et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2023

  • Analysis of the coupling coordinated development of the Population–Water–Ecology–Economy system in urban agglomerations and obstacle factors discrimination

    Open Access•Cong Zhu, Chuanglin Fang et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2023

  • Landscape structure affects the provision of multiple ecosystem services

    Open Access•Thomas Lamy, Kate Liss et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2016

  • Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Variation and Driving Mechanism of Ecological Environment Quality in the Arid Regions of Central Asia, Xinjiang

    Open Access•Xu Bi, Bianrong Chang et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Navigating trade-offs in the social-ecological systems

    Open Access•Nan Lu, Lüe Liu et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2020

  • Is shrimp farming a successful adaptation to salinity intrusion? A geospatial associative analysis of poverty in the populous Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna Delta of Bangladesh

    Open Access•Fiifi Amoako Johnson, Craig W Hutton et al.•Sustainability Science•2016

  • Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being

    Open Access•Caroline Howe, Helen Suich et al.•Global Environmental Change•2014

  • The conservation of collective-owned farmland via the transfer of development rights (TDR) in China--the case of Ecological Fruit Park in Guangzhou

    Open Access•Xiaowei Liang, Qifeng Yuan et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2020

  • Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape

    Open Access•Cibele Queiroz, Megan Meacham et al.•AMBIO•2015

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae