Geospatial Integration for TOD
Comparing White Black and Grey‐Box Models of Population Density
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21652152 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Le Tung Duong (0009-0005-8250-0694, Faculty of Civil Engineering Ton Duc Thang University Ho Chi Minh City Viet Nam, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Systems Research and Behavioral Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1092-7026 • E-ISSN: 1099-1743 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sres.70093 |
| OpenAlex | W7163155013 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 46 |
Transit‐oriented development (TOD) requires population‐density forecasts that are both accurate and interpretable. This study benchmarks three model families including white‐box (ordinary least squares), black‐box (nine ensemble/machine‐learning algorithms) and grey‐box (symbolic regression) within the Land Use Transport Feedback Cycle (LUTFC) framework for 1 km station buffers around 168 MRT stations in Singapore. The methodological contribution is a reproducible GIS workflow that integrates multi‐source geospatial data: URA Master Plan land‐use polygons; OpenStreetMap street/pedestrian networks and points of interest (POI); WorldPop population grids and the Built‐Settlement Growth Model; and ridership from LTA DataMall. From these layers, we compute LUTFC variables normalized by area (residential land share, network density, pedestrian crossing count, POI intensity, urban‐change ratio, ridership) and relate them to population density. Results reveal a clear accuracy–interpretability trade‐off: ensemble models achieve the highest predictive performance ( R 2 ≈ 0.66), linear regression attains R 2 ≈ 0.59 and symbolic regression approaches ensemble accuracy ( R 2 ≈ 0.64) while yielding closed‐form expressions that preserve interpretability. Across specifications, pedestrian crossing count and residential land share consistently dominate variable importance, reinforcing a pedestrian‐first TOD logic. The open, transferable GIS pipeline and grey‐box models together provide decision‐support that is both transparent and generalizable to rapidly urbanizing contexts where official data are limited or heterogeneous
Geographic information system · Geospatial analysis · Land use · Pedestrian · Population · Regression · Regression analysis · Workflow · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Urban Transport and Accessibility
Interpreting Black-Box Models
Quantitative Evaluation of TOD Performance Based on Multi-Source Data
Population Density Prediction at Township Scale Supported by Machine Learning Method
Nonlinear relationships and interaction effects of an urban environment on crime incidence
Built-up area and population density
Application of a Machine Learning Method for Prediction of Urban Neighborhood-Scale Air Pollution
Urban form and livability
Activity-based TOD typology for seoul transit station areas using smart-card data
Accessibility measurements in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil
Integrating Multi-Source Satellite Imagery and Socio-Economic Household Data for Wealth-Based Poverty Assessment of India
Cities of the Future
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |