On the Epistemological Relevance of Social Power and Justice in Mathematics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21655367 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eugenie Hunsicker (0000-0002-2971-108X, Loughborough University), Colin Jakob Rittberg (0000-0002-9470-6981, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | S3 |
| Pages | 1147-1168 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Axiomathes (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1122-1151 • E-ISSN: 1572-8390 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10516-022-09629-z |
| OpenAlex | W4285588260 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 46 |
In this paper we argue that questions about which mathematical ideas mathematicians are exposed to and choose to pay attention to are epistemologically relevant and entangled with power dynamics and social justice concerns. There is a considerable body of literature that discusses the dissemination and uptake of ideas as social justice issues. We argue that these insights are also relevant for the epistemology of mathematics. We make this visible by a journalistic exploration of relevant cases and embed our insights into the larger question how mathematical ideas are taken up in mathematical practices. We argue that epistemologies of mathematics ought to account for questions of exposure to and choice of attention to mathematical ideas, and remark on the political relevance of such epistemologies
Economic Justice · Epistemology · Mathematical practice · Ontology · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
Communication and Persuasion
Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands
The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science
The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education
Gender differences in grant peer review
Confirmation Bias
Elitism in mathematics and inequality
Demographic predictors of senior secondary participation in biology, physics, chemistry and earth/space sciences
Power-Dependence Relations
The class ceiling
Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles
Sexual Harassment of Women
Epistemic injustice in mathematics
Intellectual humility in mathematics
Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot
Explanation in mathematics
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |