Anlambilim-Edimbilim Ayrımı Keyfi bir Ayrım mıdır
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21677538 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mustafa Polat (0000-0003-2187-2820, Gaziantep University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 885-904 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-18 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1303-0094 |
| Publisher | Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.21547/jss.736037 |
| OpenAlex | W3047986900 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 29 |
In linguistics and philosophy, the division of labor in the study of language is commonly schematized by the basic triad that consists of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics each of which typically stands for complementary yet distinct aspects of the language- formal or natural- in question. These aspects, at face value, provide us a methodological convenience by schematically representing the structure of a language with respect to diverse linguistic roles and their explanatory significance. Although endorsing the basic triad offers some methodological convenience for the analysis of languages, the viability of the basic triad has, in recent years, been frequently challenged with the question of how to ground the distinction between semantics and pragmatics. Hence, it has become significant to answer the question of how far the semantics-pragmatics distinction in its connection with the basic triad is theoretically warranted considering the assumptions on which it rests. If the distinction cannot be grounded, it seems to have no substantial significance other than its methodological convenience as stipulative categories in a stipulative schema. In this paper, I discuss these underlying assumptions to the effect that the semantics-pragmatics distinction is a stipulative one rather than a well-grounded distinction
Cognition · Cognitive semantics · Epistemology · Linguistics · Pragmatics · Syntax · Computer Science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Meaning and necessity
Minimal Semantics
Presumptive Meanings
Context
The Myth of Conventional Implicature
How performatives work
Literal meaning
The Revenge of the Semantics‐pragmatics Distinction
Context Shifting Arguments
The semantics/pragmatics distinction
On the semantics/pragmatics distinction
The semantics/pragmatics interface from an experimental perspective
Pragmatics and intensional logic
Linguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction
Pragmatics
Meaning
Putting Things in Contexts
Literal Meaning
The Excluded Middle
Defining Pragmatics
Rethinking being Gricean
Speech Acts
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |