Mistaken Authority and Obligation
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21687134 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Luciano Venezia (0000-0002-7647-7775, National University of Quilmes, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 26 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 338-351 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Legal Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1352-3252 • E-ISSN: 1469-8048 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s135232522100001x |
| OpenAlex | W3139176500 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 7 |
Massimo Renzo argues that, as long as it is acting in good faith, an authority can issue orders that require subjects to act in ways that are morally wrong and still be acting within the scope of its jurisdiction, so that the orders are binding. This, however, is incorrect. If the authority is permitted to issue an order, it is acting within the scope of its jurisdiction and so the order creates an obligation. But if the authority is not permitted to issue the order, it is not acting within the scope of its jurisdiction and so the order does not create any obligation whatsoever. I develop my position and provide a model of mistaken authority through engagement with Renzo's view
Business · Jurisdiction · Law and economics · Obligation · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · Free Will and Agency · Law · Torture, Ethics, and Law · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |