Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

‘Who Cares?’ Exposing the Critical Paradox of Care in Performances of Disability and Disease Through the Lens of Disclosure

Bibliographic Data

ID21687451
AuthorsKate Maguire-Rosier (0000-0002-4433-5860, University of Manchester), Janet Louise Gibson (0000-0003-0130-6223), Janet Gibson
Year2022
Volume27
Issue6-7
Pages71-80
Publication date2022-10-03
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePerformance Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1352-8165 • E-ISSN: 1469-9990
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13528165.2022.2197528
OpenAlexW4385507997
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited35

Care needs to be taken in the process of making – and writing about – dance, theatre, and performance. Performers with disability and dementia highlight this need because the stakes are raised. Yet a ‘sticky’ paradox emerges. Disability rights activists are critical of care to the point of dangerous devaluation. ‘Who cares?’ They may say, in all earnestness. Yet, we must listen because of the history of abuse, neglect, and oppression of disabled people and people with dementia in the name of care, which continues today.Mobilising disability scholarship and disability performance theory Maguire-Rosier and Gibson critique unproblematised care theories and disability rights discourses, which are largely anti-care, pressing their argument through an investigation of acts of disclosure – both on stage and off – by artists with disability and performers living with dementia. These acts interrogate medical narratives of disability and disease, giving rise to a tension – a resistance to, and an embrace of, ‘care’. Maguire-Rosier presses her argument by examining Sydney-based Murmuration’s creative development of dance theatre work, Days Like These (2017), calling for acts of disclosure to be understood as performances of care. Gibson responds to Maguire-Rosier ‘s concerns by examining To Whom I May Concern® (2018) at Hill House Connecticut, where people with dementia, who do not necessarily see themselves as disabled, or ‘sufferers’ as they are frequently labelled in the media, enact disclosure as creative expression. The article presents the contradictions inherent to care epitomised not least in the dilemma of the authors disclosing on behalf of performance practitioners in this research

Aesthetics · Art · Dance · Dementia · Dilemma · Disability studies · Disease · Oppression · Political science · Sociology · Visual arts · Disability Rights and Representation · Gender Studies · Law · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics

  • “We are Performance Philosophy Problems”

    Open Access•Janet Louise Gibson, Janet Gibson et al.•Performance Philosophy•2024

  • The Biopolitics of Disability

    D Mitchell, David T Mitchell•The Biopolitics of disability•2015

  • Mad at School

    Margaret Price•Mad at School•2011

  • Broadening the dementia debate

    Open Access•Ruth Bartlett, Deborah O’connor et al.•Broadening the dementia debate•2010

  • The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability

    Open Access•Eva Feder Kittay•Ratio Juris•2011

  • How To Do Things With Words

    J L Austin, John Austin•How to do things with words•1975

  • Stalking Ableism

    Open Access•Fiona Kumari Campbell•Disability and Social Theory•2012

  • Rights in Mind

    Open Access•Tom Shakespeare, HANNAH ZEILIG et al.•Dementia•2019

  • Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex

    Kimberlé Crenshaw, Kimberlé W Crenshaw•Feminist Legal Theory•2018

  • Bodies that Matter

    Merl Storr, Society for Women in Philosophy UK•Women’s Philosophy Review•1994

  • Un/Safe Disclosures

    Alison Kafer•Journal of Literary & Cultural…•2016

  • Disability theatre in Australia

    Bryce Hadley•Research in Drama Education The…•2017

  • Towards a new directional turn? Directors with cognitive disabilities

    Open Access•Yvonne Schmidt•Research in Drama Education The…•2017

  • Mad matters

    Open Access•Mark Anthony Castrodale•Scandinavian Journal of…•2014

  • Disabled people's attitudes toward other impairment groups

    Mark Deal•Disability & Society•2003

  • Cognitive Ableism and Disability Studies

    Open Access•Licia Carlson•Hypatia•2001

  • Impairment and Disability

    Open Access•Jenny Morris•Hypatia•2001

  • Making ‘care’ accessible

    Open Access•Christine Kelly•Critical Social Policy•2011

  • Extraordinary Bodies

    Ann Folwell, Rosemarie Garland Thomson•American Literature•1998

  • Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy

    Eva Feder Kittay, Licia Carlson•Cognitive disability and its…•2010

  • The Right to Maim

    J K Puar•Right to Maim•2017

  • Prognosis time

    J K Puar•Women & Performance a journal of…•2009

  • Queering the Crip or Cripping the Queer

    Carrie Sandahl•GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay…•2003

  • Performative Acts and Gender Constitution

    Judith Butler•Theatre Journal•1988

  • Insiders and Outsiders

    Robert Κ Merton, Robert K Merton•American Journal of Sociology•1972

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae