Metacognitive sensitivity moderates reactivity to confidence ratings
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21689119 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ryan Choo (The University of Sydney), Kit S Double (0000-0001-8120-1573, The University of Sydney, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 294-306 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Thinking & Reasoning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1354-6783 • E-ISSN: 1464-0708 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13546783.2025.2542252 |
| OpenAlex | W4413104203 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 28 |
Confidence ratings are frequently used to measure metacognition. However, a growing body of evidence has found that eliciting confidence ratings affects reasoning performance – a phenomenon known as reactivity. Additionally, recent research has suggested that there are individual differences in the direction and magnitude of reactivity effects. Here, in a preregistered experiment (N = 200), we examined whether eliciting confidence ratings during a fluid intelligence test (Raven’s Progressive Matrices) affected performance, and whether this effect was moderated by participants’ baseline metacognitive abilities captured using a perceptual discrimination task. We evaluated whether reactivity was moderated by 1) metacognitive sensitivity (the extent to which confidence judgments track objective performance), 2) metacognitive efficiency (the ratio of metacognitive sensitivity relative to cognitive performance), and 3) mean confidence on the perceptual discrimination task. Our findings suggest that only metacognitive sensitivity moderated reactivity, with participants who had relatively poor metacognitive sensitivity showing positive reactivity and those with relatively good metacognitive sensitivity not showing reactivity. This suggests that eliciting confidence ratings may have a compensatory effect – benefiting those who have poorer metacognition, which suggests they may be a useful intervention for promoting metacognitive processes
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Metacognition · Metamemory · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Medicine · Memory Processes and Influences · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Psychology
How to measure metacognition
Meta-Reasoning
Overconfidence produces underachievement
Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning
Relating Introspective Accuracy to Individual Differences in Brain Structure
A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings
From local to global estimations of confidence in perceptual decisions
Poor Metacomprehension Accuracy as a Result of Inappropriate Cue Use
| Highly cited | No |
|---|