Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Metacognitive sensitivity moderates reactivity to confidence ratings

Bibliographic Data

ID21689119
AuthorsRyan Choo (The University of Sydney), Kit S Double (0000-0001-8120-1573, The University of Sydney, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume32
Issue2
Pages294-306
Publication date2026-04-03
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThinking & Reasoning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-6783 • E-ISSN: 1464-0708
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13546783.2025.2542252
OpenAlexW4413104203
LanguageEN
References cited28

Confidence ratings are frequently used to measure metacognition. However, a growing body of evidence has found that eliciting confidence ratings affects reasoning performance – a phenomenon known as reactivity. Additionally, recent research has suggested that there are individual differences in the direction and magnitude of reactivity effects. Here, in a preregistered experiment (N = 200), we examined whether eliciting confidence ratings during a fluid intelligence test (Raven’s Progressive Matrices) affected performance, and whether this effect was moderated by participants’ baseline metacognitive abilities captured using a perceptual discrimination task. We evaluated whether reactivity was moderated by 1) metacognitive sensitivity (the extent to which confidence judgments track objective performance), 2) metacognitive efficiency (the ratio of metacognitive sensitivity relative to cognitive performance), and 3) mean confidence on the perceptual discrimination task. Our findings suggest that only metacognitive sensitivity moderated reactivity, with participants who had relatively poor metacognitive sensitivity showing positive reactivity and those with relatively good metacognitive sensitivity not showing reactivity. This suggests that eliciting confidence ratings may have a compensatory effect – benefiting those who have poorer metacognition, which suggests they may be a useful intervention for promoting metacognitive processes

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Metacognition · Metamemory · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Medicine · Memory Processes and Influences · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • How to measure metacognition

    Open Access•Susan M Fleming, Stephen M Fleming et al.•Frontiers in Human Neuroscience•2014

  • Meta-Reasoning

    Open Access•Rakefet Ackerman, Valerie A Thompson•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2017

  • Overconfidence produces underachievement

    Open Access•John Dunlosky, Katherine A Rawson•Learning and Instruction•2012

  • Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning

    Anastasia Efklides•Educational Psychologist•2011

  • Relating Introspective Accuracy to Individual Differences in Brain Structure

    Open Access•Susan M Fleming, Stephen M Fleming et al.•Science•2010

  • A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings

    Open Access•Brian Maniscalco, Hakwan Lau•Consciousness and Cognition•2012

  • From local to global estimations of confidence in perceptual decisions

    Quentin Cavalan, Vincent De Gardelle et al.•2023

  • Poor Metacomprehension Accuracy as a Result of Inappropriate Cue Use

    Keith W Thiede, Thomas D Griffin et al.•Discourse Processes•2010

Highly citedNo
Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae