Jumping to conclusions predicts truncated searches even in uncongenial contexts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21689138 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James Hillman (0000-0003-0202-6127, Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, corresponding author), Brooke Burrows (0000-0003-4069-8741, Appalachian State University), David Hauser (0000-0002-5480-5213, Queen's University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 213-234 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Thinking & Reasoning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1354-6783 • E-ISSN: 1464-0708 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13546783.2025.2536581 |
| OpenAlex | W4412721440 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Jumping to conclusions (JTC) is the tendency to reach a conclusion after reviewing only minimal evidence. However, research on the ways in which this individual difference functions in motivated and unmotivated contexts is mixed. In the present research, we investigated whether JTC would predict evidence search in a context where defensive motivated processing is likely to emerge. In Study 1 participants (N = 383) completed a JTC measure then engaged in an iterative search for information to evaluate a gun-control non-profit. In Study 2 we conceptually replicated Study 1 with Democrat and Republican non-profits. Both studies found main effects of defensive processing and JTC but no interaction between predictors, suggesting that JTC is not due to lack of motivation. Defensive motivation increases search length for those high in JTC; however motivation is not sufficient to close the gap between high and low JTC individuals
Cognitive psychology · Jumping · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Forecasting Techniques and Applications · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
Why Psychologists Should by Default Use Welch’s t-test Instead of Student’s t-test
Tutorial
Neural Bases of Motivated Reasoning
The Selective Exposure Self- and Affect-Management (Sesam) Model
Reflecting on Six Decades of Selective Exposure Research
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys
Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability
Thinking Preferences and Conspiracy Belief
Guns in the North
The role of affective and cognitive attitude extremity in perceived viewpoint diversity exposure
Bias in adolescents' everyday reasoning and its relationship with intellectual ability, personal theories, and self-serving motivation
A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice
Informational Cues, Partisan-Motivated Reasoning, and the Manipulation of Conspiracy Beliefs
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Jumping to conclusions
Of preferences and priors
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability
Feeling validated versus being correct
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |