Two components of individual differences in actively open-minded thinking standards
Myside bias and uncertainty aversion
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21689179 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jonathan Baron (0000-0003-1001-9947, University of Pennsylvania, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 648-673 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Thinking & Reasoning (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1354-6783 • E-ISSN: 1464-0708 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13546783.2024.2360491 |
| OpenAlex | W4399359326 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 28 |
The theory of actively open-minded thinking (AOT) implies standards for good thinking. Two broad aspects of these standards characterise individual differences in their acceptance: myside bias, in which thinking favours possible conclusions that are already strong; and uncertainty aversion, a belief that good thinking results in high confidence. Acceptance of AOT standards is often measured with short questionnaire scales. The present paper reports one study focusing on each of these two biases in the evaluation of the trustworthiness of sources, on the basis of short statements differing in signs of myside bias or of unjustified overconfidence. A 10-item scale measuring largely myside bias predicts sensitivity to both sources of difference in the statements. A third study examines the generality of the two standards across topics. The study used four questions about each topic and an 11-item scale with more items about uncertainty aversion. Individual differences are preserved across topic, although some results imply that individual differences are more pronounced when a standard is seen as more relevant to the content. The two standards are best characterised as two unidimensional factors that are correlated with each other. Thus, individual differences in AOT standards are not unidimensional
Cognitive psychology · Econometrics · Economics · Loss aversion · Microeconomics · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Psychology · Social Psychology
Self-theories
The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration
Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking.
Meta-Reasoning
What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement
The Bias That Divides Us
The trouble with overconfidence
The need for cognition
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |