Camera Phantasma
Reframing virtual photographies in the age of AI
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21690132 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Peter Schofield (0000-0003-0899-2000, University of Leeds, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 687-709 |
| Publication date | 2024-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1354-8565 • E-ISSN: 1748-7382 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/13548565231220314 |
| OpenAlex | W4389850128 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 27 |
The recent advent of virtual photography and artificial intelligence (specifically AI photography and diffusion models), presents a major challenge to both photographers and photography theory. All our common-sense assumptions about the ontology of the image now seem to be falling apart. Are these interlopers really photography? Can we hear the final death knell for the erstwhile medium in this era of ever-increasing media convergence and virtualisation? This practice-led investigation of these new media forms draws on the author’s recent creative work in virtual photographies, and similar interventions by other photographers and new media artists, seeking to augment and expand their practice using these new tools, whilst querying what photography really means today. From in-game photography to virtual exploration using Google Street View, to AI photography using the latest denoising diffusion models (such as Midjourney), there are surprising commonalities to explore between them, linking these new practices of image-making firmly back to traditions of lens-based photography. Rather than seeking a detailed map of this difficult new terrain, or a definitive ontology of emerging virtual photographies, the author reframes the discourse around practice, examining both photography as an evolving set of practices and also notions of media hauntology – specifically the spectral ways in which new media technologies are always haunted by prior practices and modes of communication. The importance of the frame to both traditional photography and new practices of virtual photography, is suggested as a vital and persistent dimension in photographic authorship. With that authorship increasingly contested by new generative methods, easy appropriation and AI image-making, the act of framing may become the best litmus test we have, for whether or not a photograph should be considered ‘real’ or valued
Art · Generative grammar · New media · Photography · Sociology · Visual arts · World Wide Web · Cinema and Media Studies · Computer Science · Photography and Visual Culture · Visual Attention and Saliency Detection · Artificial Intelligence
Copy, Archive, Signature
The Burden of Representation
Into the Universe of Technical Images
The Truth in Painting
The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
Google Street View
Dark tourism scholarship
From IRL (in-real-life) to URL
AI and the social construction of creativity
Anomalous visual experience is linked to perceptual uncertainty and visual imagery vividness
Deconstructing “Media Convergence”
Photography in the Digital
To Scan a Ghost
Death 24x a Second
Land Matters
Photography's Expanded Field
| Citations per year | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |