Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Barriers for upgrading of latrines in rural Ethiopia

Disentangling a sanitation socio-technical lock-in

Bibliographic Data

ID21690529
AuthorsBiruk Getachew Mamo (0000-0001-8077-8231, Charles University), Josef Novotný (0000-0001-9556-7162, Charles University, corresponding author), František Ficek (0000-0003-2662-3970, Charles University)
Year2023
Volume28
Issue8
Pages1026-1044
Publication date2023-08-03
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLocal Environment (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-9839 • E-ISSN: 1469-6711
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13549839.2023.2184781
OpenAlexW4323669291
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited28

Ethiopia achieved the fastest reduction in open defaecation worldwide over the two past decades. However, it was through the use of predominantly non-durable, unhygienic latrines. It questions the presumed effects of latrine adoption on public health and heightens a risk of return to open defaecation. Resources invested into sanitation in Ethiopia may be wasted if upgrading to latrines is not facilitated. This paper aims to understand factors hindering the improvement of latrines in Southern Ethiopia based on the structured interviews and direct observations among 504 rural households supplemented by qualitative interviews with local representatives. We examine the quality and past improvements of latrines, revealed plans and attitudes regarding the improvements, willingness to pay for hygienic latrine components, costs perceptions and infrastructural barriers. We identified a socio-technical lock-in characterised by the sustained use of unhygienic latrines without recognisable shifts up the sanitation ladder. It has been cemented by the demand-oriented sanitation strategy, poverty and infrastructural constraints. People are generally satisfied with unhygienic latrines, being convinced that their use is good for health. The satisfaction curbs the demand for latrine upgrading. The demand for latrine upgrading is further reduced by poverty and material constraints, preventing local supply of hygienic sanitation components to develop. Our findings show that market approaches alone will not solve the problem. Provision of subsidised sanitation products is required together with a campaign that would disintegrate the widespread belief that the use of any latrine is good for human health

Business · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Environmental planning · Geography · Hygiene · Latrine · Open defecation · Pit latrine · Poverty · Sanitation · Socioeconomics · Toilet · Water supply · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Engineering · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Environmental Engineering

  • Promotion of market-based sanitation in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Biruk Getachew Mamo, Josef Novotný•Health Promotion International•2024

  • Poor and Dirty”

    Open Access•Salam Zoungrana•Health & Place•2024

  • Development, public health, sewage, and frontline workers

    Open Access•Abraham Geremew, Adrian Flint et al.•Development in Practice•2026

  • Determinants of biogas toilet adoption in rural Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Ftimbé Laré, Seyram Kossi Sossou et al.•Environment Development and…•2024

  • A systematic approach to behavior change interventions for the water and sanitation sector in developing countries

    Hans-Joachim Mosler•International Journal of…•2012

  • The impact of sanitation on infectious disease and nutritional status

    Open Access•Matthew C Freeman, Joshua V Garn et al.•International Journal of Hygiene…•2017

  • Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019

    Open Access•Christopher J L Murray, Aleksandr Y Aravkin et al.•The Lancet•2020

  • Comprehending practitioners’ assessments of community-led total sanitation

    Open Access•František Ficek, Josef Novotný•Health Promotion International•2019

  • The impact of war on the health system of the Tigray region in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Hailay Abrha Gesesew, Kiros Berhane et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • Will Households Invest in Safe Sanitation? Results from an Experimental Demand Trial in Nakuru, Kenya

    Open Access•Rachel Peletz, Caroline Delaire et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • The Role of Perceived Social Norms in Rural Sanitation

    Open Access•Josef Novotný, Jana Kolomazníková et al.•International Journal of…•2017

  • A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia

    Open Access•Fikralem Alemu, Abera Kumie et al.•BMC Public Health•2017

  • How does Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) affect latrine ownership? A quantitative case study from Mozambique

    Open Access•Miriam Harter, Sebastian Mosch et al.•BMC Public Health•2018

  • The social and political construction of latrines in rural Ethiopia

    Open Access•Josef Novotný, Helena Humňalová et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2018

Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae