Purity culture and the limits of queer evangelicalism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21691190 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lauren D Sawyer (0009-0005-1859-4702, The Seattle School of Theology and Psychology, The University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, corresponding author), Victoria Houser (0009-0001-0524-1271, The Seattle School of Theology and Psychology, The University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 200-218 |
| Publication date | 2023-09-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theology and Sexuality (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1355-8358 • E-ISSN: 1745-5170 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13558358.2024.2332982 |
| OpenAlex | W4393319448 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 22 |
Taking purity culture as a framework for understanding evangelical approaches to sexual ethics, this article examines the connection between the recent emergence of queer evangelical celibacy narratives and the rhetoric of purity as a form of personal freedom. To do so, we approach the construction of queer celibacy through a theology of sexuality and narratives of celibacy within purity culture. We constellate stories from gay- and lesbian-identifying evangelicals to question the limits of queer celibacy. How is evangelical celibacy queer? Can evangelical celibacy claim queerness when it depends on White heterosexist logics? To answer these questions, we explore a series of texts written by evangelical authors who have chosen celibacy as a method for their spiritual commitments while identifying as gay or lesbian. We work with these texts as examples of queer narratives that interanimate paths between evangelical belief and sexual identity
Art · Celibacy · Human sexuality · Lesbian · Literature · Narrative · Queer · Queer theory · Sociology · Gender Studies · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious studies · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Theological Perspectives and Practices
| Highly cited | No |
|---|