Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Racial Realities

Bibliographic Data

ID21692829
AuthorsLuvell Anderson (0000-0002-7944-1647, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume95
Pages15-31
Publication date2024-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplement (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1358-2461 • E-ISSN: 1755-3555
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1358246124000031
OpenAlexW4396873795
LanguageEN

How should we conceive of conflicts that seem intractable? Is there any hope of a resolution? We observe impasses between various groups concerning the Israeli and Palestinian conflict, the Movement for Black Lives and racial conservatives, and Indigenous voices versus settler colonial states. Some aspects of these impasses can surely be explained by an unwillingness by one or more parties to the conflict to yield any ground. Might there also be room for misunderstanding generated by radically different ways of conceiving the world? According to the different worlds thesis, people come to radically different understandings of the world because they inhabit incompatible conceptual realities. In this article, I endeavor to explore possible ways of understanding the thesis and its potential impact on certain normative practices we tend to take for granted

Epistemology · Political science · Sociology · Australian History and Society · Philosophy · Race, History, and American Society

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae