Motivations for specialisation
Testing the feasibility of polysemous pre-emption in the competition between will and must
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21695197 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nadine Dietrich (0009-0008-4274-3941, University of Edinburgh, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 454-477 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | English Language and Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1360-6743 • E-ISSN: 1469-4379 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1360674325100403 |
| OpenAlex | W4413409716 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
The article looks at instances of specialisation for specific linguistic contexts in ‘command’ and ‘inference’ uses of will and must. It tests the feasibility of different motivations for this specialisation, such as statistical and construal pre-emption. It also proposes a new motivation for specialisation, polysemous pre-emption, i.e. whether a strongly entrenched polyseme of a given expression might pre-empt the use of an expression with a less strongly entrenched polyseme. The investigation uses corpus analysis and distinctive collexeme analysis to test the three motivations (statistical, construal, and polysemous pre-emption). The results show that all instances of specialisation with will and must could be explained through construal pre-emption and/or polysemous pre-emption, thus making recourse to statistical pre-emption unnecessary
Biology · Epistemology · Linguistics · Computer Science · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar
Modals and Quasi-modals in English
On Our MindSalience, Context, and Figurative Language
Language, Usage and Cognition
The Dynamics of the Linguistic System
The Grammar Network
Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production
On some principles of grammaticization
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language
Making meaning with be able to
Ambiguity Avoidance by Means of Function Words in English? Providing Additional Corpus-based Counterevidence
Explain Me This
Responding to thanks
Alternation-based generalizations are stored in the mental grammar
The changing functions of competing forms
Ambiguity avoidance as a factor in the rise of the English dative alternation
The Present of the English Future
Radical Construction Grammar
A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|