Subjective well-being perceptions of Portuguese Public Relations practitioners
A gender and stages of life analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21696055 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maria João Cunha (0000-0002-0325-5709, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Universidade de Lisboa Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudos de Género/Interdisciplinary Centre for Gender Studies), Carla Cruz (0000-0003-0523-0350, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Universidade de Lisboa Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudos de Género/Interdisciplinary Centre for Gender Studies), Célia Belim (0000-0001-9927-8018, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Universidade de Lisboa Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas/Centre for Public Administration and Public Policies) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 340-362 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Communication Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1363-254X • E-ISSN: 1478-0852 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jcom-02-2024-0036 |
| OpenAlex | W4402802520 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 48 |
Purpose This research aims to explore perceptions of subjective well-being (SWB) in public relations (PR) practitioners, focusing on dimensions of job satisfaction, networking, relationships and work–life balance, while addressing the under-researched area of gender and age – related to stages of life – disparities in SWB within the PR industry. Design/methodology/approach Employing a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design, this study utilised a survey, followed by semi-structured interviews to investigate SWB among PR professionals in Portugal, considering gender and stages of life differences. Findings Using a gendered and stages of life lens, this study found nuanced perceptions of SWB among Portuguese PR professionals. Older women showed higher emotional well-being but lower work evaluations than men, while young professionals exhibited less gender disparities in SWB. Men reported greater job satisfaction, emphasising passion, while women faced challenges like work overload and valued recognition. Gender differences were seen in networking, with men favouring teamwork and women valuing friendships for career advancement. Work–life balance issues, especially among older women, related to mental health. Originality/value This study contributes to filling the research gap regarding SWB in the PR industry, particularly in Portugal, offering insights into gender and stages of life dynamics that influence SWB perceptions, thereby informing strategies for enhancing well-being and productivity in PR workplaces
Perception · Political science · Politics · Portuguese · Public life · Public relations · Sociology · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Law · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
The Science of Well-Being
Measures of Subjective Well-Being
Understanding subjective well-being
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
Social Exchange Theory
Overlapping Stigmas of Pregnancy, Motherhood, and Weight
Well-Being in Life and Well-Being at Work
Women in public relations (1982–2019)
Achieving leadership and success
Effects of career development learning on students’ perceived employability
Networking via LinkedIn
Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health
Juggling during Lockdown
Work–Life Balance
Life satisfaction and job and personal resources among public workers with non-standard work schedules
Women, men, work, and family
Enemy at the (house) gates
Barriers to networking for women in a UK professional service
Women in the workforce
Bibliometric analysis and network mapping of the scientific literature on the influence of public relations on well-being and happiness
Good Mothers Work”
The Norm of Reciprocity
Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |