Readiness as a new framework for crisis management
Academic-industry integrated expert insights from practitioners and scholars
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21696069 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yan Jin (0000-0001-7749-7367, University of Georgia), Brittany N Shivers (0009-0007-4327-6823, University of Georgia), Yijing Wang (0000-0002-7886-8366, Erasmus University Rotterdam), W Timothy Coombs (0000-0002-3693-4388, Communications Research Centre Canada), T G L A Van Der Meer (0000-0002-7605-2021, Amsterdam University of the Arts) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Communication Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1363-254X • E-ISSN: 1478-0852 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jcom-02-2024-0034 |
| OpenAlex | W4400100832 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 21 |
Purpose The study provides an initial empirical examination of Jin et al .’s (2024) new READINESS model through the expert opinions of crisis communication academics and practitioners. Through this examination, the goal is to understand crisis READINESS and how it relates to other key concepts in the crisis literature, such as preparedness and resilience. Design/methodology/approach An exploratory quantitative online survey of 30 experts in crisis communication was conducted. Our participant pool consisted of members from the Crisis Communication Think Tank, which is an established crisis thought leadership network (Jin, 2023). Data collection took place in November and December 2023. Findings Key findings include the dual nature of crisis READINESS as both a process and an outcome, resilience as both a process and an outcome, and preparedness as an antecedent to READINESS. A key distinction between READINESS and preparedness emerged with the former conceived of as a mindset and the latter conceived of as physical tools, training and planning. Originality/value Preparedness and resilience alone are not enough to effectively manage crises and risks, and given this, it is important to study READINESS as a concept beyond (yet connected to) preparedness and resilience. It is our hope that the findings can lead to understanding indicators of crisis READINESS and developing crisis READINESS measurement tools which can equip organizations to more effectively manage crises
Business · Crisis communication · Crisis management · Economics · Knowledge management · Management · Political science · Public relations · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Team Dynamics and Performance · Marketing
Psychological resilience and crisis Readiness
Advancing cyber crisis readiness
Generative AI risks
Developing a Readiness mindset with trauma-informed management for crisis communication
Strengthening corporations’ crisis readiness
Organization-issue dynamics
The well-being-enhanced Readiness model
“Chrono” crises
Trust Erosion Framework for Organisational Responses to and Management of Global Emergencies
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 9 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |