Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Water right forfeiture in Washington state from 1967 to 2019

Bibliographic Data

ID21696869
AuthorsMatthew A Yourek (0000-0002-6056-1286, Washington State University), Daniel Haller (0009-0005-6368-1012, b Geosyntec Consultants, Yakima, WA, USA), Nicholas A Potter (0000-0002-3410-3732, c USDA, Economic Research Service, Kansas City, MO, USA), Kirti Rajagopalan (0000-0002-7086-9858, Washington State University), Kairon Shayne D Garcia (0000-0002-9397-7229, d California State University, Long Beach, CA, USA), Jonathan Yoder (0000-0002-9049-9591, Washington State University)
Year2026
Publication date2026-06-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueWater Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1366-7017 • E-ISSN: 1996-9759
PublisherIWA Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2166/wp.2026.096
OpenAlexW7167671439
LanguageEN
References cited1

Diagram summarizing the methodology and key findings of the paper. Under the prior appropriation doctrine of the Western United States, persistent nonuse of a water right may lead to its forfeiture. Although water right forfeiture is statutorily defined, its incidence remains poorly understood. This paper analyzes water right forfeiture in Washington State from 1967 to 2019 to address this knowledge gap. The data primarily come from water right change requests, but we also examine court decisions in general adjudications and orders issued by the regulatory agency. We show that forfeiture following review of a water right change request was relatively uncommon before the 2000s but became substantially more frequent thereafter. We further show that forfeiture rates vary geographically, with some subbasins experiencing much higher rates than others. Additionally, forfeiture incidence varies across water right type, purpose of use, and type of owner, among other dimensions. Compared with change authorizations, forfeiture resulting from State-issued orders has occurred less often, especially in recent years. Finally, we found that adjudication accounts for the majority of the state's forfeiture by volume of water. This analysis provides valuable information for evaluating forfeiture policy and managing water rights

Adjudication · Appropriation · Doctrine · Water right · Environmental law and policy · Property Rights and Legal Doctrine · Water Governance and Infrastructure

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae