Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Resolving complaints about the quality of drinking water among water supply operators in the Czech Republic

Bibliographic Data

ID21697266
AuthorsFrantišek Kožíšek (0000-0002-0107-6969, a National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 48/49, Praha 10 100 00, Czech Republic, corresponding author), Jiří Paul (b Vodovody a kanalizace Beroun, a.s., Mostníkovská 255/3, Beroun 266 01, Czech Republic), Petr Pumann (0000-0002-8199-1883, a National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 48/49, Praha 10 100 00, Czech Republic)
Year2025
Volume27
Issue4
Pages385-399
Publication date2025-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueWater Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1366-7017 • E-ISSN: 1996-9759
PublisherIWA Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2166/wp.2025.092
OpenAlexW4408507664
LanguageEN
References cited23

According to a survey, 12% of the Czech population does not drink tap water. The main reasons given are poor aesthetic quality of water (42%) and health concerns (15%). The latter reason does not appear to be objectively based and must therefore have other causes, such as how well consumers are informed and how effectively their complaints are dealt with. Therefore, a questionnaire survey was carried out among water supply operators focusing on these aspects. The survey showed that only 62% of them have a Complaints Code and that only 53% of the operators record complaints about water quality. The number of recorded complaints per 100,000 consumers varied by several orders of magnitude. This difference was not only due to different water quality but also primarily due to different efficiency of complaint collection and, most importantly, to very different internal definitions of complaints. Under the new EU Drinking Water Directive, water suppliers will be obliged to publish information on complaints, but without the term ‘complaint’ being defined. If the numbers of published complaints are used by consumers or the media as an indicator for utility benchmarking, we may get a very false picture from which the public will draw incorrect conclusions

Agricultural economics · Business · Czech · Economics · Physics · Water quality · Water resource management · Water supply · Environmental Science · Environmental Science and Water Management · Philosophy · Water Quality and Pollution Assessment · Ecology · Environmental Engineering

  • Evaluating the policy of listening to customer claims in a drinking water utility using fuzzy-AHP approach and Waspas method

    Open Access•Faiza Bouchraki, Ali Berreksi et al.•Water Policy•2021

  • Utility approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of consumer confidence reports

    Open Access•Jessica Evans, Adam T Carpenter•Utilities Policy•2019

  • Customer complaint management and smart technology adoption by community water systems

    Open Access•Morgan DiCarlo, Emily Zechman Berglund et al.•Utilities Policy•2022

  • Evaluating determinants of social trust in water utilities

    Open Access•Madeline A Grupper, Michael G Sorice et al.•Conservation Ecology•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae