Huckleberry Finn’s Conscience

Reckoning with the Evasion

Bibliographic Data

ID21700922
AuthorsSteve Clarke (0000-0001-5692-0031, Charles Sturt University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume24
Issue4
Pages485-508
Publication date2020-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1382-4554 • E-ISSN: 1572-8609
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10892-020-09341-3
PMID33184557
OpenAlexW3086882527
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited31

Huck Finn’s struggles with his conscience, as depicted in Mark Twain’s famous novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (AHF) (1884), have been much discussed by philosophers; and various philosophical lessons have been extracted from Twain’s depiction of those struggles. Two of these philosophers stand out, in terms of influence: Jonathan Bennett and Nomy Arpaly. Here I argue that the lessons that Bennett and Arpaly draw are not supported by a careful reading of AHF. This becomes particularly apparent when we consider the final part of the book, commonly referred to, by literary scholars, as ‘the evasion’. During the evasion Huck behaves in ways that are extremely difficult to reconcile with the interpretations of AHF offered by Bennett and Arpaly. I extract a different philosophical lesson from AHF than either Bennett or Arpaly, which makes sense of the presence of the evasion in AHF. This lesson concerns the importance of conscious moral deliberation for moral guidance and for overcoming wrongful moral assumptions. I rely on an interpretation of AHF that is influential in literary scholarship. On it the evasion is understood as an allegory about US race relations during the 20-year period from the end of the US Civil War to the publication of AHF

Conscience · Epistemology · American and British Literature Analysis · American Literature and Humor Studies · Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research · Medicine · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access