Aan het Nederlands lijkt best wat te knutselen
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21701048 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marten Van Der Meulen (0000-0002-2644-8319), N van der Sijs (0000-0001-9042-6336) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 387-395 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nederlandse taalkunde (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1384-5845 • E-ISSN: 2352-1171 |
| Publisher | Amsterdam University Press (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.5117/nedtaa2020.2-3.021.vand |
| OpenAlex | W3094298296 |
| Language | NL |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 5 |
The influence of prescriptivism on Dutch Weerman (2003) unequivocally rejected the possibility for language to be malleable. At the time, there was little empirical research to challenge or support this claim. Over the last two decades, however, a fairly large body of research has delved into this issue. In light of this, we review some of Weerman’s views, and discuss new findings of the recent literature, both for Dutch and other languages. We show how new methods and insights have led to a re-evaluation of the effects of prescriptivism. We furthermore argue that, rather than categorically dismissing effects of prescriptivism, researchers should focus on case studies with different parameters, including linguistic level, prohibition strength and time period
Linguistics · Physics · Political science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |