Twee vroege constructiegrammaticale studies in Nederlandse Taalkunde
Een terugblik op Schermer-Vermeer (2001) en Verhagen (2003a)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21701052 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Timothy Colleman (0000-0002-3723-3807, Ghent University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 333-343 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nederlandse taalkunde (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1384-5845 • E-ISSN: 2352-1171 |
| Publisher | Amsterdam University Press (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.5117/nedtaa2020.2-3.016.coll |
| OpenAlex | W3093888010 |
| Language | NL |
| References cited | 7 |
Two early construction-grammatical studies in Dutch Linguistics. Looking back onSchermer-Vermeer (2001) andVerhagen (2003a) This article looks back on the articles by Schermer-Vermeer (2001) and Verhagen (2003a), on the double object construction and a Dutch equivalent of the English ‘way’-construction, respectively, which can be considered the first two articles to have appeared in Nederlandse Taalkunde that address problems of Dutch grammar from an explicitly constructionist perspective. I illustrate how, on the basis of data from a large web corpus such as NLCOW14, the formal and semantic analyses offered in the two articles can be refined in a number of ways, but I also show that they include hypotheses and ideas that are still most relevant and relate to topical discussions in construction grammar
Construction Grammar · Epistemology · Grammar · Linguistics · Sociology · Strict constructionism · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |