Minority Rights Denials in Ethiopia

This article explores the constitutional promises and practices of self-rule in Ethiopia federal system focusing on the Konso ethnic group’s quest for self-rule. Given that the federal project in Ethiopia is a new model (synthesis) that has replaced the failed ‘Nation-State’ building effort since 1991, self-rule has become the ideological heart of the incumbent party and a pillar of the constitution. To this end, the article used a qualitative research approach that relied on both primary and secondary sources of data. Interviews, field observation, focus group discussions, and document analysis were utilised to obtain data. The findings show that, despite the fact that both the fdre and snnprs constitutions promised “unconditional right to every national, nationality, and people to have the right to self-determination up to secession,” the Konso quest for self-rule was rejected, their previous semi-autonomous status was dissolved, and they were relegated to ordinary Woreda. The merger transformed Special Woredas into ordinary Woredas while also shifting nationality self-rule to multi-ethnic self-rule, resulting in a paradigm shift in terms of self-rule practice. The Woredas lack essential identity-related self-government autonomy, such as the capacity to choose the working language and the right to appoint and remove officials as needed. A major source of concern is the decline in capital budgets and the delayed development of infrastructure. As a result, the snnp regional government has breached both its original ideological vows and the framework of the constitution

Human rights · Political science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · African history and culture analysis · Law

• Ethnic Federalism

  Open Access•Kathrine Holden•Journal of Peace Research•2006

  Add to list

• Nation-Building or Nation-Destroying

  Open Access•Walker Connor•World Politics•1972

  Add to list