Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Plans, Open Future and the Prospects for a Good Life

Bibliographic Data

ID21701828
AuthorsHolmer Steinfath (0000-0003-3574-5988, University of Göttingen, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume27
Issue3
Pages459-472
Publication date2024-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthical Theory and Moral Practice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1386-2820 • E-ISSN: 1572-8447
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10677-023-10387-z
OpenAlexW4361276300
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited18

How we live our lives depends on how we relate to our past, present and future. The article focusses on the relation to our future. The target of my critique is a “planning conception” that imagines the future as a realm that we can rationally plan and form in light of our ends. In the first section I present an outline of the planning conception, building on Bratman’s planning theory and Rawls’ idea of a life plan. The second section highlights the attractions of the planning conception. I argue that this conception offers a prima facie intriguing view of the temporality of human life. It promises a life in which we can control the passage of time. The third section reveals severe limitations of the planning conception. I question the claim that plans are central to our self-understanding and to a good life. The planning conception tends to distort the temporality of human life with respect to past, present and future. Given this diagnosis, I sketch an alternative in the last section of the paper. I explore the temporal specifics of ways of understanding oneself as a person and argue that both the formation and the very form of these ‘ways of being’ do not follow the logic of planning

Epistemology · Philosophy of medicine · Political science · Prima facie · Rationality · Realm · Sketch · Sociology · Temporality · Computer Science · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · History · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Religion and Society Interactions

  • Symposium in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Topic

    Open Access•Eva Weber-Guskar, Holmer Steinfath•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2024

  • The Ethics of Fire

    Open Access•Conrad Heilmann, Marta Szymanowska•Journal of Business Ethics•2026

  • “If You Look Closely, You Have Everything …”

    Open Access•Daniel Broschmann, Lisa Nebel et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2025

  • Psychosocial Problems and Spiritual Coping Strategies Experienced by Patients who Have Suffered a Myocardial Infarction

    Open Access•Sevgi Demir Çam, Sevda Uzun et al.•Journal of Religion and Health•2026

  • Planning Agency, Autonomous Agency

    Michael E Bratman•Structures of Agency•2007

  • Well‐being and Time

    Open Access•J David Velleman•Pacific philosophical quarterly•1991

  • Three Theories of Self-Governance

    Michael E Bratman•Structures of Agency•2007

  • Doing Valuable Time

    Cheshire Calhoun•Doing Valuable Time•2018

  • Necessity, Volition, and Love

    Open Access•Harry G Frankfurt, Horacio Pons•Necessity, Volition, and Love•1998

  • The Future of the Philosophy of Time

    Dana Goswick•The Philosophical Quarterly•2015

  • Aspiration

    Open Access•Robert J Hartman•The Philosophical Quarterly•2019

  • Structures of Agency

    Michael E Bratman•Structures of Agency•2007

Unique citing works4
Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae